Literature DB >> 11220234

[Evaluation of a telemedicine pilot project].

R Schiener1, R O Bredlich, H Pillekamp, R U Peter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Rapid progress in computer and information technologies has led to an increased interest in the use of telemedicine during the past few years. Thus it should be clarified, whether teledermatology can achieve comparable results to conventional specialist examination and advice. PATIENTS/
METHODS: We initiated a pilot study, comparing teledermatology with conventional examination in a dermatology outpatient setting. 60 patients were included.
RESULTS: Out of 60 teledermatological examinations, remote clinicians were in agreement with face-to-face clinicians in 90%. Teledermatology was unable to make a useful diagnosis in 6 patients, however further diagnostic procedures were ordered, enabling teledermatologists to achieve correct diagnoses. Regarding need for further diagnostic tests, there was no difference between teledermatology and conventional examination.
CONCLUSIONS: Teledermatology appears suitable to transfer a dermatologist's expertise over large distances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11220234     DOI: 10.1007/s001050051257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hautarzt        ISSN: 0017-8470            Impact factor:   0.751


  2 in total

1.  [Teledermoscopy by mobile phones : Reliable help in the diagnosis of skin lesions?]

Authors:  A Zink; A Kolbinger; M Leibl; I Léon Suarez; J Gloning; C Merkel; J Winkler; T Biedermann; J Ring; B Eberlein
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  [Teledermatology versus consultations--a comparative study of 120 consultations].

Authors:  F E Herrmann; K Sönnichsen; A Blum
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.751

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.