Literature DB >> 11219778

Evaluation of self-collected cervicovaginal cell samples for human papillomavirus testing by polymerase chain reaction.

P E Gravitt1, J V Lacey, L A Brinton, W A Barnes, J R Kornegay, M D Greenberg, S M Greene, O C Hadjimichael, L McGowan, R Mortel, P E Schwartz, R Zaino, A Hildesheim.   

Abstract

As human papillomavirus (HPV) becomes accepted as the central cause of cervical cancer, longitudinal studies are shifting focus away from causality to a more detailed investigation of the natural history of HPV infections. These studies commonly require repeated samples for HPV testing over several years, usually collected during a pelvic exam, which is inconvenient to the participants and costly to the study. To alleviate the inconvenience and cost of repeated clinic visits, it has been proposed that women collect cervicovaginal cells themselves, hopefully increasing participation in the natural history studies. We evaluated the technical feasibility of self-collection of cervicovaginal cells using a Dacron swab for HPV DNA detection. We compared the self-collected swab sample and two clinician-administered swab samples (one from the endocervix and another from the ectocervix) from a total of 268 women participating in a case-control study of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix (111 cases and 157 controls). HPV DNA was detected and genotyped using an L1 consensus PCR assay. The overall agreement between the clinician- and self-collected swabs was excellent [88.1%; kappa = 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-0.85)]. The correlation was highest between the two clinician-administered swabs [kappa = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69-0.93)] but was still excellent when comparing either clinician-administered swab to the self-administered sample [kappa = 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.87) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55-0.79) for ectocervix and endocervix, respectively]. The type-specific agreement between samples was higher for high-risk, or cancer-associated, HPV genotypes than for low risk, noncancer-associated HPV genotypes when comparing the self-administered swab sample to the clinician-administered swab sample (kappa = 0.78 for high-risk versus 0.66 for low-risk HPV infections, t = -1.45, P = 0.15). The decrease in agreement for low risk types was largely attributable to an increased detection of these types in the self-administered sample (McNemar's chi2 = 6.25, P = 0.01 for clinician- versus self-administered swab comparisons). The agreement did not vary significantly by age, menopausal status, case status, or clinic center. We have demonstrated that a self-collected Dacron swab sample of cervicovaginal cells is a technically feasible alternative to clinician-administered cervical cell collection in natural history studies of HPV and cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11219778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  47 in total

1.  Self testing for human papillomaviruses.

Authors:  C S Herrington
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The Natural History of Oral Human Papillomavirus in Young Costa Rican Women.

Authors:  Daniel C Beachler; Krystle A Lang Kuhs; Linda Struijk; John Schussler; Rolando Herrero; Carolina Porras; Allan Hildesheim; Bernal Cortes; Joshua Sampson; Wim Quint; Paula Gonzalez; Aimée R Kreimer
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Human Papillomavirus Infection in Women Who Submit Self-collected Vaginal Swabs After Internet Recruitment.

Authors:  Erik J Nelson; John Hughes; J Michael Oakes; Bharat Thyagarajan; James S Pankow; Shalini L Kulasingam
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-06

4.  Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Effectiveness and Herd Protection in Young Women.

Authors:  Chelse Spinner; Lili Ding; David I Bernstein; Darron R Brown; Eduardo L Franco; Courtney Covert; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Genital transmission of human papillomavirus in recently formed heterosexual couples.

Authors:  Ann N Burchell; François Coutlée; Pierre-Paul Tellier; James Hanley; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening by high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples.

Authors:  Akhila Balasubramanian; Shalini L Kulasingam; Atar Baer; James P Hughes; Evan R Myers; Constance Mao; Nancy B Kiviat; Laura A Koutsky
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 7.  The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  F X Bosch; A Lorincz; N Muñoz; C J L M Meijer; K V Shah
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Human papillomavirus infection in women in Puerto Rico: agreement between physician-collected and self-collected anogenital specimens.

Authors:  Ana Patricia Ortiz; Josefina Romaguera; Cynthia M Pérez; Yomayra Otero; Marievelisse Soto-Salgado; Keimari Méndez; Yari Valle; Maria Da Costa; Erick Suarez; Joel Palefsky; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Can clinical tests help monitor human papillomavirus vaccine impact?

Authors:  Elissa Meites; Carol Lin; Elizabeth R Unger; Martin Steinau; Sonya Patel; Lauri E Markowitz; Susan Hariri
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  From the NIH: proceedings of a workshop on the importance of self-obtained vaginal specimens for detection of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Marcia M Hobbs; Barbara van der Pol; Patricia Totten; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anna Wald; Terri Warren; Rachel L Winer; Robert L Cook; Carolyn D Deal; M Elizabeth Rogers; Julius Schachter; King K Holmes; David H Martin
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.