Literature DB >> 11218099

An alternate MLU calculation: magnitude and variability of effects.

J R Johnston1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of removing elliptical question responses, imitative utterances, and single-word Yes/No responses before calculating MLU. Forty-seven language samples from preschoolers with and without language impairment were analyzed. Initial MLUs ranged from 2.0 to 6.5 across both groups. The alternate calculation procedures resulted in an average 18% increase in the MLU index, with individual samples increasing as little as 3% or as much as 49%. The magnitude of the effect was primarily related to discourse properties, although in the SLI group there were secondary relationships to language level and proficiency. The observed variation in the discourse properties of language samples makes the alternate MLU index attractive to clinicians and researchers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11218099     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/014)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  8 in total

Review 1.  Reporting child language sampling procedures.

Authors:  Lizbeth H Finestack; Bita Payesteh; Jill Rentmeester Disher; Hannah M Julien
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Effects of sampling context on spontaneous expressive language in males with fragile X syndrome or Down syndrome.

Authors:  Sara T Kover; Andrea McDuffie; Leonard Abbeduto; W Ted Brown
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The influence of phonetic complexity on stuttered speech.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Coalson; Courtney T Byrd; Barbara L Davis
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.346

4.  Behavioral inhibition and childhood stuttering.

Authors:  Dahye Choi; Edward G Conture; Tedra A Walden; Warren E Lambert; Victoria Tumanova
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 2.538

5.  Phonetic complexity of words immediately following utterance-initial productions in children who stutter.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Coalson; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  Is Putting SUGAR (Sampling Utterances of Grammatical Analysis Revised) Into Language Sample Analysis a Good Thing? A Response to Pavelko and Owens (2017).

Authors:  Ling-Yu Guo; Sarita Eisenberg; Nan Bernstein Ratner; Brian MacWhinney
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Length of Utterance, in Morphemes or in Words?: MLU3-w, a Reliable Measure of Language Development in Early Basque.

Authors:  Maria-José Ezeizabarrena; Iñaki Garcia Fernandez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-08

8.  The Acquisition of Clause Chaining in Nungon.

Authors:  Hannah S Sarvasy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.