Literature DB >> 11217898

Coexistence under positive frequency dependence.

J Molofsky1, J D Bever, J Antonovics.   

Abstract

Negative frequency dependence resulting from interspecific interactions is considered a driving force in allowing the coexistence of competitors. While interactions between species and genotypes can also result in positive frequency dependence, positive frequency dependence has usually been credited with hastening the extinction of rare types and is not thought to contribute to coexistence. In the present paper, we develop a stochastic cellular automata model that allows us to vary the scale of frequency dependence and the scale of dispersal. The results of this model indicate that positive frequency dependence will allow the coexistence of two species at a greater rate than would be expected from chance. This coexistence arises from the generation of banding patterns that will be stable over long time-periods. As a result, we found that positive frequency-dependent interactions over local spatial scales promote coexistence over neutral interactions. This result was robust to variation in boundary conditions within the simulation and to variation in levels of disturbance. Under all conditions, coexistence is enhanced as the strength of positive frequency-dependent interactions is increased.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11217898      PMCID: PMC1088603          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  8 in total

1.  Isolation by Distance.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1943-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Competition between Species: Frequency Dependence.

Authors:  F J Ayala
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The dynamics of infinitesimally rare alleles, applied to the evolution of mutation rates and the expression of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  K J Dawson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 4.  Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones.

Authors:  N H Barton; G M Hewitt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The evidence for apostatic selection.

Authors:  B Clarke
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Epidemiology and genetics in the coevolution of parasites and hosts.

Authors:  R M May; R M Anderson
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1983-10-22

7.  Frequency-dependent selection and competition: empirical approaches.

Authors:  J Antonovics; P Kareiva
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1988-07-06       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Resource concentration and herbivory in oak forests.

Authors:  D J Futuyma; S S Wasserman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-21       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  A novel theory to explain species diversity in landscapes: positive frequency dependence and habitat suitability.

Authors:  Jane Molofsky; James D Bever
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Differential response to frequency-dependent interactions: an experimental test using genotypes of an invasive grass.

Authors:  Alexandra Collins; E M Hart; J Molofsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Context dependence in the coevolution of plant and rhizobial mutualists.

Authors:  Katy D Heath; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Cooperation and cheating in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the roles of the las, rhl and pqs quorum-sensing systems.

Authors:  Cara N Wilder; Stephen P Diggle; Martin Schuster
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 5.  Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests.

Authors:  James D Bever
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Population structure reduces benefits from partner choice in mutualistic symbiosis.

Authors:  Erol Akçay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Spatial heterogeneity in soil microbes alters outcomes of plant competition.

Authors:  Karen C Abbott; Justine Karst; Lori A Biederman; Stuart R Borrett; Alan Hastings; Vonda Walsh; James D Bever
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A nucleation framework for transition between alternate states: short-circuiting barriers to ecosystem recovery.

Authors:  Theo K Michaels; Maarten B Eppinga; James D Bever
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 9.  Incorporating the soil environment and microbial community into plant competition theory.

Authors:  Po-Ju Ke; Takeshi Miki
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.