Literature DB >> 11216817

In vivo hemodynamic, histologic, and antimineralization characteristics of the Mosaic bioprosthesis.

I G Duarte1, M J MacDonald, W A Cooper, S L Schmarkey, J P Gott, W M Brown, J Vinten-Johansen, R A Guyton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Performance of bioprosthetic valves is limited by tissue degeneration due to calcification with reduced performance and longevity. The Mosaic bioprosthetic valve (Medtronic Heart Valves, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) combines zero pressure fixation, antimineralization properties of alpha-amino oleic acid (AOA), and a proven stent design. We tested the hypothesis that AOA treatment of Mosaic valves improves hemodynamics, antimineralization properties, and survival in a chronic ovine model.
METHODS: Mitral valves were implanted in juvenile sheep with Mosaic valves with AOA treatment (n = 8) or without AOA treatment (non-AOA, n = 8), or Hancock I (HAN, n = 4) tissue valves, and explanted at 20 postoperative weeks.
RESULTS: Survival was equivalent in AOA and non-AOA (140 +/- 0.4 and 129 +/- 30 days), but was significantly less in HAN (82 +/- 35). Leaflet calcium (microgCa/mg tissue) was less in AOA (9.6 +/- 13.9; p < 0.05 versus non-AOA and HAN) than non-AOA (96.3 +/- 63.8) and HAN (130.8 +/- 43.2). Explant valve orifice area (cm2) was significantly preserved in the AOA group compared with the non-AOA group (1.5 +/- 0.7 vs 0.8 +/- 0.3; p < 0.05 versus non-AOA and HAN).
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that AOA treatment of Mosaic valves reduces leaflet calcification and valve gradient in juvenile sheep, and that the Mosaic design and fixation features may offer survival advantages that must be confirmed in extended trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11216817     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01989-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of structural valve deterioration and long-term clinical outcomes after bovine pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Woojung Kim; Ho Young Hwang; Yoonjin Kang; Ji Seong Kim; Suk Ho Sohn; Jae Woong Choi; Kyung Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The Mosaic Mitral Valve Bioprosthesis: A Long-Term Clinical and Hemodynamic Follow-Up.

Authors:  Michele Celiento; Stefania Blasi; Andrea De Martino; Stefano Pratali; Aldo D Milano; Uberto Bortolotti
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2016-02-01

3.  Degenerative processes in bioprosthetic mitral valves in juvenile pigs.

Authors:  Jesper L Honge; Jonas A Funder; Torben B Pedersen; Mads B Kronborg; J Michael Hasenkam
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Surgical aortic valve replacement with a stented pericardial bioprosthesis: 5-year outcomes.

Authors:  Robert J M Klautz; François Dagenais; Michael J Reardon; Rüdiger Lange; Michael G Moront; Louis Labrousse; Neil J Weissman; Vivek Rao; Himanshu J Patel; Fang Liu; Joseph F Sabik
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.534

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.