Literature DB >> 11216760

Safety and efficacy of a heparin removal device: a prospective randomized preclinical outcomes study.

J B Zwischenberger1, W Tao, D J Deyo, R A Vertrees, S K Alpard, G Shulman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic protamine sulfate for heparin reversal after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with uncommon, but life-threatening adverse reactions.
METHODS: In a prospective randomized 3-day outcomes study, a heparin removal device (HRD) group (n = 12; 60-, 80-, 100-kg subgroups) was compared with a matched systemic Protamine group (Protamine; n = 6) for safety and efficacy using an adult swine model of CPB (60 minutes, 28 degrees C).
RESULTS: HRD run time was 25 to 38 minutes depending on weight without complications. After HRD, heparin concentration decreased from 4.77 +/- 0.17 to 0.45 +/- 0.06 U/mL (activated clotting time [ACT] 776 +/- 83 to 180 +/- 12 seconds), and in Protamine, 3.94 +/- 0.63 to 0.13 +/- 0.02 U/mL (ACT 694 +/- 132 to 101 +/- 5 seconds) (p = 0.01 between groups, but no significant differences 60 minutes later). No significant difference between HRD and Protamine to 72 hours was seen in plasma-free hemoglobin C3a, heparin concentration, thromboelastogram index, platelet count, activated partial thromboplastin time, anti-thrombin III, fibrinogen, ACT, and tissue histology.
CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective randomized outcomes study, HRD achieved predictable reversal of systemic heparinization after CPB with no difference in safety or outcomes compared with protamine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11216760     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01990-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  1 in total

1.  Reversal agents in anaesthesia and critical care.

Authors:  Nibedita Pani; Pradeep A Dongare; Rajeeb Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2015-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.