Literature DB >> 11215729

Misinterpretation of human electrogastrograms related to inappropriate data conditioning and acquisition using digital computers.

M P Mintchev1, P Z Rashev, K L Bowes.   

Abstract

Despite the fact that digital techniques for data acquisition and processing were widely used in electrogastrographic (EGG) research during the last decade, inappropriate signal conditioning and digitization are still potential pitfalls threatening the reliability of the experiments. The aim of this paper was to review: (1) the importance of the antialiasing low-pass filtering for reducing recording artifacts and interferences, (2) the advantages brought by the proper choice of filter cutoff frequency and the slope for the decrement of the minimal required sampling frequency, (3) the impact of incorrectly selected sampling frequency on data interpretations, with particular attention to the percent distribution ranges, and (4) the "leakage effect" related to the finite number of samples processed simultaneously in frequency domain representation of the recordings. A model of electrogastrographic (EGG) recording was mixed with a model of electrocardiographic (ECG) artifact. The resulting finite-duration signal was low-pass filtered and then digitized with a sampling frequency of 1 Hz. The cutoff frequency of the first-order low-pass filter was altered from 0.5 to 0.1 Hz. Amplitude frequency spectra of the digitized recordings were investigated. An example with a real human electrogastrogram in which an ECG artifact was present confirmed the simulation results. When a first-order anti-aliasing filter is utilized at least a fivefold difference between the filter cutoff frequency and the sampling frequency is recommended for compliance with the Nyquist theorem of digitization. Leakage effects associated with the finite-time duration of the recordings and the use of the discrete Fourier transform should be considered when frequency domain analysis is performed. Misinterpretation of the "bradygastric" and "tachygastric" ranges in the percent distribution of EGG frequency components is possible if inappropriate signal conditioning and digitization are employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11215729     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026468731662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  8 in total

1.  Pitfalls in the analysis of electrogastrographic recordings.

Authors:  M A Verhagen; L J Van Schelven; M Samsom; A J Smout
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Extracting quantitative information from digital electrogastrograms.

Authors:  M P Mintchev; K L Bowes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Detection and deletion of motion artifacts in electrogastrogram using feature analysis and neural networks.

Authors:  J Liang; J Y Cheung; J D Chen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Running spectrum analysis as an aid in the representation and interpretation of electrogastrographic signals.

Authors:  E J van der Schee; J L Grashuis
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Abnormal gastric myoelectrical activity and delayed gastric emptying in patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroparesis.

Authors:  J D Chen; Z Lin; J Pan; R W McCallum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Gastric pacing improves emptying and symptoms in patients with gastroparesis.

Authors:  R W McCallum; J D Chen; Z Lin; B D Schirmer; R D Williams; R A Ross
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Accuracy of cutaneous recordings of gastric electrical activity.

Authors:  M P Mintchev; Y J Kingma; K L Bowes
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Effect of electrical stimulation on gastric electrical activity, motility and emptying.

Authors:  J C Eagon; K A Kelly
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.598

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  EGG data.

Authors:  Robert M Stern; Kenneth L Koch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Electrogastrography: methodology, validation and applications.

Authors:  Jieyun Yin; Jiande D Z Chen
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.924

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.