A Hodge1, A J Patterson, W J Brown, P Ireland, G Giles. 1. Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Anti Cancer Council of Victoria, 1 Rathdowne Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053. ahodge@accv.org.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of the Anti Cancer Council of Victoria food frequency questionnaire (ACCVFFQ) relative to seven-day weighed food records (WFRs) in 63 women of child-bearing age. METHOD: 63 women completed WFRs to assess iron intake as part of a study on iron deficiency. These women also completed the ACCVFFQ. Nutrient intakes were computed independently for the WFRs and FFQs. Intakes were compared as group means, by correlation and by quintile classification, adjusting for day-to-day variation in intakes, and for energy intake. Individual differences in results were also examined. RESULTS: The strongest associations between WFR and FFQ results were energy-adjusted, log-transformed and adjusted for day-to-day variability in intake. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.28 for vitamin A to 0.78 for carbohydrate. Mean intakes from the WFRs and FFQs were within +/- 20% for 21 of 27 nutrients. Poor agreement between FFQs and WFRs for retinol intake was due to the inclusion of liver in two WFRs, an item which is not included in the FFQ. CONCLUSION: The ACCVFFQ performs as well as other FFQs for which validation data are available. The relatively poor measurement of retinol is consistent with other data, and with the limited number of foods in which this nutrient is abundant. IMPLICATIONS: The availability of an optically scannable valid instrument for assessing dietary intake will facilitate epidemiological studies of diet and disease, an area of current research priority.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of the Anti Cancer Council of Victoria food frequency questionnaire (ACCVFFQ) relative to seven-day weighed food records (WFRs) in 63 women of child-bearing age. METHOD: 63 women completed WFRs to assess iron intake as part of a study on iron deficiency. These women also completed the ACCVFFQ. Nutrient intakes were computed independently for the WFRs and FFQs. Intakes were compared as group means, by correlation and by quintile classification, adjusting for day-to-day variation in intakes, and for energy intake. Individual differences in results were also examined. RESULTS: The strongest associations between WFR and FFQ results were energy-adjusted, log-transformed and adjusted for day-to-day variability in intake. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.28 for vitamin A to 0.78 for carbohydrate. Mean intakes from the WFRs and FFQs were within +/- 20% for 21 of 27 nutrients. Poor agreement between FFQs and WFRs for retinol intake was due to the inclusion of liver in two WFRs, an item which is not included in the FFQ. CONCLUSION: The ACCVFFQ performs as well as other FFQs for which validation data are available. The relatively poor measurement of retinol is consistent with other data, and with the limited number of foods in which this nutrient is abundant. IMPLICATIONS: The availability of an optically scannable valid instrument for assessing dietary intake will facilitate epidemiological studies of diet and disease, an area of current research priority.
Authors: Elizabeth G Eakin; Marina M Reeves; Alison L Marshall; David W Dunstan; Nicholas Graves; Genevieve N Healy; Jonathan Bleier; Adrian G Barnett; Trisha O'Moore-Sullivan; Anthony Russell; Ken Wilkie Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kevin P Mc Namara; Johnson George; Sharleen L O'Reilly; Shane L Jackson; Gregory M Peterson; Helen Howarth; Michael J Bailey; Gregory Duncan; Peta Trinder; Elizabeth Morabito; Jill Finch; Stephen Bunker; Edward Janus; Jon Emery; James A Dunbar Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Philip J Morgan; Clare E Collins; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Patrick McElduff; Tracy Burrows; Janet M Warren; Myles D Young; Nina Berry; Kristen L Saunders; Elroy J Aguiar; Robin Callister Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Nicholas Graves; Adrian G Barnett; Kate A Halton; Jacob L Veerman; Elisabeth Winkler; Neville Owen; Marina M Reeves; Alison Marshall; Elizabeth Eakin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 3.240