Literature DB >> 11214718

Development of an ADL instrument targeting elderly persons with age-related macular degeneration.

S Dahlin-Ivanoff1, U Sonn, E Svensson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to estimate the needs of early intervention in a health education program, an ADL instrument measuring feelings of (in)security was needed. The instrument was intended to detect early signs of decline and to evaluate ADL performance among persons with AMD. An evaluative instrument must have a high level of responsiveness, which is the ability to detect true changes over time but must also show a high level of intra-individual agreement in a test-retest assessment.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop an ADL instrument for evaluative purposes and to establish the reliability and the responsiveness of the instrument.
METHOD: The target group comprised all persons referred by an ophthalmologist for low vision rehabilitation, 65 years and older, living at home, with aged-related macular degeneration as the primary diagnosis and with distance visual acuity of the better eye with best correction not lower than 0.1. A non-parametric statistical method that is developed for paired ordered parametrical data was applied in order to measure the systematic and occasional intra-rater disagreement separately and to measure the responsiveness.
CONCLUSION: The test-retest study showed that the ADL-instrument had a high level of test-retest stability, which is a condition for responsiveness. The instrument was found to be responsive. It could therefore detect true longitudinal changes and be used for evaluative purposes targeting elderly with AMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11214718     DOI: 10.1080/096382801750058152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  5 in total

1.  A method to analyse observer disagreement in visual grading studies: example of assessed image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT images.

Authors:  K Ledenius; E Svensson; F Stålhammar; L-M Wiklund; A Thilander-Klang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Patient-reported physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review of content and format.

Authors:  Kate Williams; Anja Frei; Anders Vetsch; Fabienne Dobbels; Milo A Puhan; Katja Rüdell
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Responsiveness of the Revised Low Vision Independence Measure (LVIM-R).

Authors:  Theresa M Smith; Ickpyo Hong; Timothy A Reistetter
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct

4.  The Work Stress Questionnaire (WSQ) - reliability and face validity among male workers.

Authors:  Anna Frantz; Kristina Holmgren
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Comparing oculomotor efficiency and visual attention between drivers and non-drivers through the Adult Developmental Eye Movement (ADEM) test: A visual-verbal test.

Authors:  Andrés Gené-Sampedro; Francisco Alonso; Celia Sánchez-Ramos; Sergio A Useche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.