Literature DB >> 11214698

Spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory anginal pain and normal coronary arteries.

G A Lanza1, A Sestito, S Sandric, B Cioni, G Tamburrini, A Barollo, F Crea, F De Seta, M Meglio, F Bellocci, A Maseri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be effective in patients with refractory angina and coronary artery disease. No previous study assessed the clinical effects of SCS in patients with refractory angina who present angiographically normal coronary arteries.
METHODS: SCS was performed in 7 patients (4 men, 3 women, mean age 59.3 +/- 11 years) with refractory angina and normal coronary arteries. Clinical status was assessed 1 month after SCS device implantation and at a mean follow-up of 11 months (range 2-17 months) by: 1) an estimate of the number of anginal attacks and nitrate consumption in the 2 weeks prior to implantation and to follow-up visits; 2) a score of quality of life by a visual analogic scale; 3) a five-item questionnaire assessing effort angina and satisfaction with treatment; 4) treadmill exercise testing.
RESULTS: At the last follow-up the number of anginal episodes (p < 0.001) and nitrate consumption (p < 0.004) were both reduced by SCS. Visual analogic scale score improved from 2.1 +/- 0.98 to 9.0 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.001) at 1 month and to 6.4 +/- 2.3 (p < 0.01) at the last follow-up. Questionnaire analysis showed that mild (p = 0.006) and moderate (p = 0.000) physical activity, as well as patient satisfaction with anginal status (p = 0.000) and with current treatment (p = 0.000) all improved by SCS. Finally, time to 1 mm ST segment depression, time to angina, and exercise duration were all prolonged by SCS.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data point out that SCS may considerably improve anginal symptoms and exercise tolerance in a significant number of patients with refractory angina and normal coronary arteries and therefore it should be considered as a valuable treatment option in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11214698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital Heart J        ISSN: 1129-471X


  13 in total

1.  The complex link between brain and heart in cardiac syndrome X.

Authors:  G A Lanza; F Crea
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Angina pectoris and normal coronary arteries: cardiac syndrome X.

Authors:  Filippo Crea; Gaetano A Lanza
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Microvascular angina and the continuing dilemma of chest pain with normal coronary angiograms.

Authors:  Richard O Cannon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA): Developing Evidence-Based Therapies and Research Agenda for the Next Decade.

Authors:  C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine; Mary Norine Walsh; Jerome L Fleg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Why names matter for women: MINOCA/INOCA (myocardial infarction/ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease).

Authors:  Christine Pacheco Claudio; Odayme Quesada; Carl J Pepine; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Long-term follow-up of patients with cardiac syndrome X treated by spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Gregory Angelo Sgueglia; Alfonso Sestito; Antonella Spinelli; Beatrice Cioni; Fabio Infusino; Fabio Papacci; Fulvio Bellocci; Mario Meglio; Filippo Crea; Gaetano Antonio Lanza
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: Current Gaps and Future Directions.

Authors:  Islam Y Elgendy; Lina Ya'Qoub; Kuan-Han Chen; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Non-obstructive Plaque and Treatment of INOCA: More to Be Learned.

Authors:  Lina Ya'Qoub; Islam Y Elgendy; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 5.967

Review 9.  Cardiac Syndrome X: update 2014.

Authors:  Shilpa Agrawal; Puja K Mehta; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.213

10.  Long-term prognosis of patients with cardiac syndrome X: a review.

Authors:  I A C Vermeltfoort; G J J Teule; A B van Dijk; H J Muntinga; P G H M Raijmakers
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.