Literature DB >> 11214448

Ambient air quality monitoring network design for assessing human health impacts from exposures to airborne contaminants.

R W Baldauf1, D D Lane, G A Marote.   

Abstract

Existing methods of establishing ambient air quality monitoring networks typically evaluate only parameters related to ambient concentrations of the contaminant(s) of interest such as emission source characteristics, atmospheric transport and dispersion, secondary reactions, deposition characteristics, and local topography. However, adverse health risks from exposures to airborne contaminants are a function of the contaminant and the anatomic and physiologic characteristics of the exposed population. Thus, ambient air quality monitoring networks designed for the protection of public health or for epidemiological studies evaluating adverse health impacts from exposures to ambient air contaminants should account for both contaminant characteristics and human health parameters. A methodology has been established which optimizes ambient air quality monitoring networks for assessments of adverse human health impacts from exposures to airborne contaminants by incorporating human health risk assessment techniques. The use of risk assessment techniques as the basis for designing ambient air quality monitoring networks will help to target limited financial and human resources to evaluate human health risks from exposures to airborne contaminants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11214448     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026428214799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  8 in total

1.  Optimization of ambient air quality monitoring networks : (Part I).

Authors:  P M Modak; B N Lohani
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Methodology for designing air quality monitoring networks: I. Theoretical aspects.

Authors:  M K Liu; J Avrin; R I Pollack; J V Behar; J L McElroy
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Air quality monitoring for multiple pollutants: Optimization of a network around a hypothetical potash plant and two thermal power stations in open countryside.

Authors:  F J Serón Arbeloa; C P Caseiras; L J Nogué Lahuerta; P M Latorre Andrés
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Assessment of risk from multimedia exposures of children to environmental chemicals.

Authors:  D Mukerjee
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Unraveling cancer risk with cellular and molecular tools.

Authors:  M Patlak
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Air pollution and mortality: the implications of uncertainties in regression modeling and exposure measurement.

Authors:  F W Lipfert; R E Wyzga
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  Short-term effects of air pollution on hospital admissions of respiratory diseases in Europe: a quantitative summary of APHEA study results. Air Pollution and Health: a European Approach.

Authors:  C Spix; H R Anderson; J Schwartz; M A Vigotti; A LeTertre; J M Vonk; G Touloumi; F Balducci; T Piekarski; L Bacharova; A Tobias; A Pönkä; K Katsouyanni
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

8.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities.

Authors:  D W Dockery; C A Pope; X Xu; J D Spengler; J H Ware; M E Fay; B G Ferris; F E Speizer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Application of a risk assessment based approach to designing ambient air quality monitoring networks for evaluating non-cancer health impacts.

Authors:  Richard W Baldauf; Dennis D Lane; Glen A Marotz; H William Barkman; Thomas Pierce
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Risk-based prioritization of air pollution monitoring using fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique.

Authors:  Faisal I Khan; Rehan Sadiq
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Extending the use of air quality indices to reflect effective population exposure.

Authors:  Aleksandra M Zujić; Bojan B Radak; Anka J Filipović; Dragan A Marković
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Evaluation of air quality in Chengdu, Sichuan Basin, China: are China's air quality standards sufficient yet?

Authors:  Xue Qiao; Daniel Jaffe; Ya Tang; Meaghan Bresnahan; Jie Song
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Air quality status of an open pit mining area in India.

Authors:  S K Chaulya
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Multicriteria relocation analysis of an off-site radioactive monitoring network for a nuclear power plant.

Authors:  Ni-Bin Chang; Shu-Kuang Ning; Jen-Chang Chen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.644

7.  A data-driven approach for optimal design of integrated air quality monitoring network in a chemical cluster.

Authors:  Zhengqiu Zhu; Bin Chen; Sihang Qiu; Rongxiao Wang; Yiping Wang; Liang Ma; Xiaogang Qiu
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.963

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.