Literature DB >> 11213881

Graftskin, a human skin equivalent, is effective in the management of noninfected neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial.

A Veves1, V Falanga, D G Armstrong, M L Sabolinski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed in a randomized prospective trial the effectiveness of Graftskin, a living skin equivalent, in treating noninfected nonischemic chronic plantar diabetic foot ulcers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 24 centers in the U.S., 208 patients were randomly assigned to ulcer treatment either with Graftskin (112 patients) or saline-moistened gauze (96 patients, control group). Standard state-of-the-art adjunctive therapy, which included extensive surgical debridement and adequate foot off-loading, was provided in both groups. Graftskin was applied at the beginning of the study and weekly thereafter for a maximum of 4 weeks (maximum of five applications) or earlier if complete healing occurred. The major outcome of complete wound healing was assessed by intention to treat at the 12-week follow-up visit.
RESULTS: At the 12-week follow-up visit, 63 (56%) Graftskin-treated patients achieved complete wound healing compared with 36 (38%) in the control group (P = 0.0042). The Kaplan-Meier median time to complete closure was 65 days for Graftskin, significantly lower than the 90 days observed in the control group (P = 0.0026). The odds ratio for complete healing for a Graftskin-treated ulcer compared with a control-treated ulcer was 2.14 (95% CI 1.23-3.74). The rate of adverse reactions was similar between the two groups with the exception of osteomyelitis and lower-limb amputations, both of which were less frequent in the Graftskin group.
CONCLUSIONS: Application of Graftskin for a maximum of 4 weeks results in a higher healing rate when compared with state-of-the-art currently available treatment and is not associated with any significant side effects. Graftskin may be a very useful adjunct for the management of diabetic foot ulcers that are resistant to the currently available standard of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11213881     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  135 in total

Review 1.  Science, medicine and the future: healing chronic wounds.

Authors:  K G Harding; H L Morris; G K Patel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-19

Review 2.  Use of sugar on the healing of diabetic ulcers: a review.

Authors:  Atanu Biswas; Manish Bharara; Craig Hurst; Rainer Gruessner; David Armstrong; Horacio Rilo
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

Review 3.  Healing the diabetic wound and keeping it healed: modalities for the early 21st century.

Authors:  Matthew J Claxton; David G Armstrong; Andrew J M Boulton
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  [Possible interventions in impaired wound healing].

Authors:  S Coerper; S Beckert; H D Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Use of negative pressure wound therapy over clean, closed surgical incisions.

Authors:  James P Stannard; Allen Gabriel; Burkhard Lehner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Does Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen Improve Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing?

Authors:  Lawrence A Lavery; Easton C Ryan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-21

Review 7.  Human acellular dermal wound matrix: evidence and experience.

Authors:  Robert S Kirsner; Greg Bohn; Vickie R Driver; Joseph L Mills; Lillian B Nanney; Marie L Williams; Stephanie C Wu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Hyaluronic Acid Sodium Salt 0.2% Gel in the Treatment of a Recalcitrant Distal Leg Ulcer: A Case Report.

Authors:  Mario Tagliagambe; Tuan A Elstrom; Daniel B Ward
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2017-11-01

9.  The cost effectiveness of Apligraf treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  W Ken Redekop; Joseph McDonnell; Paul Verboom; Kornelia Lovas; Zoltan Kalo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Extracorporeal shock wave therapy suppresses the early proinflammatory immune response to a severe cutaneous burn injury.

Authors:  Thomas A Davis; Alexander Stojadinovic; Khairul Anam; Mihret Amare; Shruti Naik; George E Peoples; Douglas Tadaki; Eric A Elster
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.