Literature DB >> 11213867

The potentially poor response to outpatient diabetes care in urban African-Americans.

C B Cook1, R H Lyles, I El-Kebbi, D C Ziemer, D L Gallina, V G Dunbar, L S Phillips.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: HbA1c levels can be reduced in populations of diabetic patients, but some individuals may exhibit little improvement. To search for reasons underlying differences in HbA1c outcome, we analyzed patients managed in an outpatient diabetes clinic. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: African-Americans with type 2 diabetes were categorized as responders, intermediate responders or poor responders according to their HbA1c level after 1 year of care. Logistical regression was used to determine baseline characteristics that distinguished poor responders from responders. Therapeutic strategies were examined for each of the response categories.
RESULTS: The 447 patients had a mean age and disease duration of 58 and 5 years, respectively, and BMI of 32 kg/m2. Overall, the mean HbA1c level fell from 9.6 to 8.1% after 12 months. Mean HbA1c levels improved from 8.8 to 6.2% in responders, and from 9.5 to 7.9% in intermediate responders. In poor responders, the average HbA1c level was 10.8% on presentation and 10.9% at 1 year. The odds of being a poor responder were significantly increased with longer disease duration, higher initial HbA1c level, and greater BMI. Although doses of oral agents and insulin were significantly higher among poor responders at most visits, the acceleration of insulin therapy did not occur until late in the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical diabetes programs need to devise methods to identify patients who are at risk for persistent hyperglycemia. Whereas patient characteristics explain some heterogeneity of HbA1c outcome (and may aid in earlier identification of patients who potentially may not respond to conventional treatment), insufficient intensification of therapy may also be a component underlying the failure to achieve glycemic goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11213867     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  7 in total

Review 1.  Diabetes in African Americans.

Authors:  M C Marshall
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Individual-, Community-, and Health System-Level Barriers to Optimal Type 2 Diabetes Care for Inner-City African Americans: An Integrative Review and Model Development.

Authors:  Jennifer A Campbell; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.140

3.  Personal features and dropout from diabetic care.

Authors:  Yumi Masuda; Akira Kubo; Akatsuki Kokaze; Masao Yoshida; Kanako Sekiguchi; Nobuki Fukuhara; Yataka Takashima
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Point of care testing to improve glycemic control.

Authors:  George Rust; Morna Gailor; Elvan Daniels; Barbara McMillan-Persaud; Harry Strothers; Robert Mayberry
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2008

5.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the control of cardiovascular disease risk factors in Southwest American veterans with type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Outcomes in Veterans Study.

Authors:  Christopher S Wendel; Jayendra H Shah; William C Duckworth; Richard M Hoffman; M Jane Mohler; Glen H Murata
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes.

Authors:  A G Jones; A T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Obesity independently predicts responders to biphasic insulin 50/50 (Humalog Mix50 and Insuman Comb 50) following conversion from other insulin regimens: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Mamza; R Mehta; I Idris
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2014-05-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.