BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolaemia is a common lipid disorder that predisposes for premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). We set up a screening programme in the Netherlands in 1994 to: establish the feasibility of active family screening supported by DNA diagnostics; assess whether or not active identification of these patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia would lead to more cholesterol-lowering treatment; and compare diagnosis by DNA analysis with that by cholesterol measurement. METHODS: Both DNA analysis and measurement of cholesterol concentrations were used to screen families in which a functional mutation in the LDL-receptor gene had been detected. FINDINGS: In the first 5 years, 5442 relatives of 237 people with familial hypercholesterolaemia were screened; 2039 individuals were identified as heterozygous by LDL-receptor gene mutation analysis. At the time of examination, 667 of these adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia (39%) received some form of lipid-lowering treatment; 1 year later, this percentage had increased to 93%. In addition, laboratory analysis showed that for carriers as well as non-carriers 18% would have been misdiagnosed by cholesterol measurement alone, with sex-specific and age-specific 90th percentiles of the general Dutch population as diagnostic criteria. INTERPRETATION: Targeted family screening with DNA analysis proved to be highly effective in identifying patients with hypercholesterolaemia. Most of the identified patients sought treatment and were successfully started on cholesterol-lowering treatment to lower the risk of premature CVD. Our findings could have wider relevance for the screening of other prevalent genetic disorders in the population at large.
BACKGROUND:Familial hypercholesterolaemia is a common lipid disorder that predisposes for premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). We set up a screening programme in the Netherlands in 1994 to: establish the feasibility of active family screening supported by DNA diagnostics; assess whether or not active identification of these patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia would lead to more cholesterol-lowering treatment; and compare diagnosis by DNA analysis with that by cholesterol measurement. METHODS: Both DNA analysis and measurement of cholesterol concentrations were used to screen families in which a functional mutation in the LDL-receptor gene had been detected. FINDINGS: In the first 5 years, 5442 relatives of 237 people with familial hypercholesterolaemia were screened; 2039 individuals were identified as heterozygous by LDL-receptor gene mutation analysis. At the time of examination, 667 of these adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia (39%) received some form of lipid-lowering treatment; 1 year later, this percentage had increased to 93%. In addition, laboratory analysis showed that for carriers as well as non-carriers 18% would have been misdiagnosed by cholesterol measurement alone, with sex-specific and age-specific 90th percentiles of the general Dutch population as diagnostic criteria. INTERPRETATION: Targeted family screening with DNA analysis proved to be highly effective in identifying patients with hypercholesterolaemia. Most of the identified patients sought treatment and were successfully started on cholesterol-lowering treatment to lower the risk of premature CVD. Our findings could have wider relevance for the screening of other prevalent genetic disorders in the population at large.
Authors: Frauke Becker; Carla G van El; Dolores Ibarreta; Eleni Zika; Stuart Hogarth; Pascal Borry; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Jean Jacques Cassiman; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Shirley Hodgson; A Cécile J W Janssens; Helena Kaariainen; Michael Krawczak; Ulf Kristoffersson; Jan Lubinski; Christine Patch; Victor B Penchaszadeh; Andrew Read; Wolf Rogowski; Jorge Sequeiros; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Irene M van Langen; Helen Wallace; Ron Zimmern; Jörg Schmidtke; Martina C Cornel Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Joshua W Knowles; Emily C O'Brien; Karen Greendale; Katherine Wilemon; Jacques Genest; Laurence S Sperling; William A Neal; Daniel J Rader; Muin J Khoury Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Ingrid Brænne; Mariana Kleinecke; Benedikt Reiz; Elisabeth Graf; Tim Strom; Thomas Wieland; Marcus Fischer; Thorsten Kessler; Christian Hengstenberg; Thomas Meitinger; Jeanette Erdmann; Heribert Schunkert Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Roeland Huijgen; Iris Kindt; Sjoerd B J Verhoeven; Eric J G Sijbrands; Maud N Vissers; John J P Kastelein; Barbara A Hutten Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 3.240