Literature DB >> 11212905

A randomized phase II and pharmacokinetic study of dacarbazine in patients with recurrent glioma.

S V Rajkumar1, J M Reid, P J Novotny, S L Safgren, B W Scheithauer, P S Johnson, S Nair, R F Morton, A K Hatfield, J E Krook, M M Ames, J C Buckner.   

Abstract

We conducted a randomized phase II study to determine the efficacy of dacarbazine (DTIC) in recurrent gliomas. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either DTIC 750 mg/m2 IV day 1 every 28 days (Arm A) or DTIC 200 mg/m2 IV days 1-5 every 28 days (Arm B). Pharmacokinetics were studied in 6 patients on each arm using HPLC analysis. Thirty-nine patients (30 male, 9 female), ages 27-67 years (median 53) were entered on the study (20 on Arm A, 19 on Arm B). No objective responses were seen. Median time to progression was 3 months. Median survival was 8 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Major toxicities were grade 1-2 nausea (33%). lethargy (28%), diarrhea (15%), alopecia (15%), and grade 3 neutropenia (8%). Four patients on Arm A had mild self-limited episodes of intravascular hemolysis occurring immediately after drug infusion, the mechanism of which is unknown. Mean AUC for DTIC, HMMTIC (5-[3-hydroxymethyl-3-methyl-1-triazeno] imidazole-4-carboxamide), and MTIC (5-[3-methyl-1-triazenol imidazole-4-carboxamide), in Arm A were 14.8, 0.17, and 1.15 mM min, respectively. Corresponding values for Arm B (on day 1 of 5) were 1.7, 0.06, and 0.29 mM min, respectively. The predicted HMMTIC and MTIC exposure over 5 days for Arm B, based on the day 1 data, is higher than with Arm A. We conclude that DTIC is well tolerated but does not have activity in patients with recurrent gliomas. The 5-day schedule appears less toxic, and pharmacokinetic studies show that it provides greater exposure to MTIC and HMMTIC compared to the one-day schedule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11212905     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006454427026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  24 in total

Review 1.  Temozolomide: a review of its discovery, chemical properties, pre-clinical development and clinical trials.

Authors:  E S Newlands; M F Stevens; S R Wedge; R T Wheelhouse; C Brock
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 2.  Pharmacobiochemistry of arylalkyltriazenes and their application in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  M K Spassova; E V Golovinsky
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 12.310

3.  Role of DTIC (NSC-45388) in the chemotherapy of sarcomas.

Authors:  J A Gottlieb; R S Benjamin; L H Baker; R M O'Bryan; J G Sinkovics; B Hoogstraten; J M Quagliana; S E Rivkin; G P Bodey; V Rodriguez; G R Blumenschein; J H Saiki; C Coltman; M A Burgess; P Sullivan; T Thigpen; R Bottomley; S Balcerzak; T E Moon
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1976-02

4.  Phase II evaluation of infusional etoposide and cisplatin in patients with recurrent astrocytoma.

Authors:  J C Buckner; L D Brown; T L Cascino; J B Gerstner; J E Krook; M W Westberg; M Wiesenfeld; J R O'Fallon; B Scheithauer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  The basis for current treatment recommendations for malignant gliomas.

Authors:  H A Fine
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Epigenetic effects of the methylating agent 5-(3-methyl-1-triazeno) imidazole-4-carboxamide in human melanoma cells.

Authors:  I P Hayward; P G Parsons
Journal:  Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci       Date:  1984-10

7.  Combined modality approach to treatment of malignant gliomas--re-evaluation of RTOG 7401/ECOG 1374 with long-term follow-up: a joint study of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  D F Nelson; M Diener-West; J Horton; C H Chang; D Schoenfeld; J S Nelson
Journal:  NCI Monogr       Date:  1988

8.  Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery.

Authors:  M D Walker; S B Green; D P Byar; E Alexander; U Batzdorf; W H Brooks; W E Hunt; C S MacCarty; M S Mahaley; J Mealey; G Owens; J Ransohoff; J T Robertson; W R Shapiro; K R Smith; C B Wilson; T A Strike
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparisons of carmustine, procarbazine, and high-dose methylprednisolone as additions to surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of malignant glioma.

Authors:  S B Green; D P Byar; M D Walker; D A Pistenmaa; E Alexander; U Batzdorf; W H Brooks; W E Hunt; J Mealey; G L Odom; P Paoletti; J Ransohoff; J T Robertson; R G Selker; W R Shapiro; K R Smith; C B Wilson; T A Strike
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1983-02

10.  Comparison of the cytotoxicity in vitro of temozolomide and dacarbazine, prodrugs of 3-methyl-(triazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide.

Authors:  L L Tsang; C P Quarterman; A Gescher; J A Slack
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  1 in total

1.  The relationship between six-month progression-free survival and 12-month overall survival end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Karla V Ballman; Jan C Buckner; Paul D Brown; Caterina Giannini; Patrick J Flynn; Betsy R LaPlant; Kurt A Jaeckle
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 12.300

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.