Literature DB >> 11212456

The CRABEL score--a method for auditing medical records.

J R Crawford1, T P Beresford, K L Lafferty.   

Abstract

Medical record keeping has become increasingly important particularly for research, audit and medico-legal purposes. The authors present a protocol, the CRABEL score, that is quick and easy to use for the assessment of the quality of medical record keeping with the purpose of standardizing the audit of medical records and improving their quality.

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11212456      PMCID： PMC2503558     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN： 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  7 in total

1.  Medical records.

Authors:  D Kalra
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1992-05

Review 2.  Random review of hospital patient records.

Authors:  D A Heath
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-03-10

3.  Retrospective review of hospital patient records.

Authors:  J G Williams; M J Kingham; J M Morgan; A B Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-04-14

4.  Inadequacies of hospital medical records.

Authors:  A G Patel; T Mould; P J Webb
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Notes: a suitable case for audit.

Authors:  J Twigg; T Briggs; C Parker; R Miller
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Improving problem oriented medical records through self-audit.

Authors:  G L Dickie; M J Bass
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Medical audit of case notes on one to one basis.

Authors:  G S Rai; E McInnes; V Phongsathorn; D E Sharland
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1991-10
  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  An assessment of the quality of clinical records in elective orthopaedics using the STAR score.

Authors:  Lava Chalikonda; Nigel Phelan; John O'Byrne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  The ANKLe score: an audit of otolaryngology emergency clinic record keeping.

Authors:  Sara C Dexter; Daichi Hayashi; James R Tysome
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Content, accuracy and completeness of patient consent in a regional vascular surgery unit.

Authors:  D McGrogan; D Mark; B Lee; M E O'Donnell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Quality of Surgical Case Notes at Dow University Hospital according to modified ANKLe score.

Authors:  Masood Jawaid; Nighat Bakhtiar; Abdul Khalique; Zubia Masood
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  The STAR score: a method for auditing clinical records.

Authors:  H Tuffaha; T Amer; P Jayia; C Bicknell; N Rajaretnam; P Ziprin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  The TONK score: a tool for assessing quality in trauma and orthopaedic note-keeping.

Authors:  Zeeshan Khan; Adele E Sayers; Mohammad Usman Khattak; Iain Richard Chambers
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2015-11-02

7.  The e-CRABEL score: an updated method for auditing medical records.

Authors:  Tharsika Myuran; Oliver Turner; Bijan Ben Doostdar; Bryony Lovett
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2017-01-16

8.  Evaluation of Patients Record and its Implications in the Management of Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Anant Gupta; Kanika Jain; Sanjeev Bhoi
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2020-12-07

9.  Quality of records keeping by undergraduate dental students in ibadan, Nigeria.

Authors:  E B Dosumu; O O Dosumu; F B Lawal
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2012-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.