Literature DB >> 11211098

Developing porosity of poly(propylene glycol-co-fumaric acid) bone graft substitutes and the effect on osteointegration: a preliminary histology study in rats.

K U Lewandrowski1, J D Gresser, S Bondre, A E Silva, D L Wise, D J Trantolo.   

Abstract

Bioresorbable bone graft substitutes could eliminate disadvantages associated with the use of autografts, allografts and other synthetic materials. We investigated a bioresorbable bone graft substitute made from the unsaturated polyester poly(propylene fumarate) which is crosslinked in the presence of soluble and insoluble calcium filler salts. This compact bone graft substitute material develops porosity in vivo by leaching of the soluble filler salts. In attempt to develop materials whose in vivo porosity can be designed such that implant degradation would occur at a rate that remains supportive of the overall structural integrity of the repairing defect site, we studied the early tissue response upon implantation in a bony defect. Three grout formulations of varying solubilities using slightly soluble hydroxyapatite (HA) and soluble calcium acetate (CA) were evaluated in 3 mm holes made in the anteromedial tibial metaphysis of 200 g Sprague Dawley rats (n = 16 per formulation for a total of 48 animals). Grout formulations cured in situ. Animals from each formulation were sacrificed in groups of 8 at 4 days and 3 weeks postoperatively. Histologic analysis of the healing process revealed improved in vivo osteointegration of bone graft substitutes when a higher loading of calcium acetate was employed. All formulations maintained implant integrity and did not provoke sustained inflammatory responses. This study suggested that the presence of a soluble salt permits in vivo development of porosity of a poly(propylene fumarate) based bone graft substitute material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11211098     DOI: 10.1163/156856200744075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed        ISSN: 0920-5063            Impact factor:   3.517


  6 in total

1.  Injectable PolyMIPE Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Robert S Moglia; Jennifer L Robinson; Andrea D Muschenborn; Tyler J Touchet; Duncan J Maitland; Elizabeth Cosgriff-Hernandez
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  A poly(propylene glycol-co-fumaric acid) based bone graft extender for lumbar spinal fusion: in vivo assessment in a rabbit model.

Authors:  David D Hile; Frank Kandziora; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Stephen A Doherty; Michael P Kowaleski; Debra J Trantolo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Evaluation of an injectable, photopolymerizable three-dimensional scaffold based on D: ,L: -lactide and epsilon-caprolactone in a tibial goat model.

Authors:  Geert Vertenten; Lieven Vlaminck; Tomasz Gorski; Elke Schreurs; Wim Van Den Broeck; Luc Duchateau; Etienne Schacht; Frank Gasthuys
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Modeling vascularized bone regeneration within a porous biodegradable CaP scaffold loaded with growth factors.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Sun; Yunqing Kang; Jiguang Bao; Yuanyuan Zhang; Yunzhi Yang; Xiaobo Zhou
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in 3-D Zr-Si organic-inorganic scaffolds produced by two-photon polymerization technique.

Authors:  Anastasia Koroleva; Andrea Deiwick; Alexander Nguyen; Sabrina Schlie-Wolter; Roger Narayan; Peter Timashev; Vladimir Popov; Viktor Bagratashvili; Boris Chichkov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Effect of porosities of bilayered porous scaffolds on spontaneous osteochondral repair in cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Zhen Pan; Pingguo Duan; Xiangnan Liu; Huiren Wang; Lu Cao; Yao He; Jian Dong; Jiandong Ding
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2015-03-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.