Literature DB >> 11209584

Comparison of visual estimates of children's portion sizes under both shared-plate and individual-plate conditions.

A V Shankar1, J Gittelsohn, R Stallings, K P West, T Gnywali, C Dhungel, B Dahal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper compares the accuracy of visual estimations of children's food intake in settings where several children eat together off 1 plate vs individual-plate eating scenarios.
DESIGN: Eight trained observers were tested in their ability to estimate food portions consumed by children enacting common eating scenarios. Foods were categorized by food group and according to their presentation by individual-plate and shared-plate. Observed food weight estimates were compared to actual weights. SUBJECTS/
SETTING: The 8 observers visually estimated 69 food portions of children eating alone and 26 portions where children were eating from a shared plate. This study was carried out in Sarlahi District, a rural, central lowland region of Nepal. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to examine associations between estimated and actual weights. A fixed effects model was constructed to compare observers.
RESULTS: Analyses revealed that observer estimates of food weights under field conditions were well correlated with actual weights for individual-plate (r = 0.89) and for shared-plate (r = 0.84) scenarios. Observers estimated food weights when children ate together on a shared plate less accurately than they did in settings where children ate alone. With the exception of 1 observer, observers did not differ significantly in their ability to estimate food weights. Accuracy of estimations was influenced by food weight with greater error associated with food quantities of less than 70 g.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual estimation is a relatively accurate, valid method of assessing child food intake under rural field conditions, and the only method to obtain accurate information on dietary intake in regions where shared-plate eating is frequent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11209584     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00014-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  6 in total

1.  Digital photography: a new method for estimating food intake in cafeteria settings.

Authors:  D A Williamson; H R Allen; P Davis Martin; A Alfonso; B Gerald; A Hunt
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Patterns and determinants of small-quantity LNS utilization in rural Malawi and Mozambique: considerations for interventions with specialized nutritious foods.

Authors:  Stephen R Kodish; Nancy J Aburto; Mutinta Nseluke Hambayi; Filippo Dibari; Joel Gittelsohn
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Observe Before You Leap: Why Observation Provides Critical Insights for Formative Research and Intervention Design That You'll Never Get From Focus Groups, Interviews, or KAP Surveys.

Authors:  Steven A Harvey
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2018-06-29

4.  Portion size and consistency as indicators of complementary food energy intake.

Authors:  Emily C Faerber; Aryeh D Stein; Amy Webb Girard
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Validation of visual estimation of portion size consumed as a method for estimating food intake by young Indian children.

Authors:  Pratibha Dhingra; Sunil Sazawa; Venugopal P Menon; Usha Dhingra; Robert E Black
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Study Design and Protocol to Assess Fruit and Vegetable Waste at School Lunches.

Authors:  Allison Marshall; Gregory Bounds; Krista Patlovich; Christine Markham; Alicia Farhat; Nan Cramer; Amanda Oceguera; Travis Croom; Jamie Carrillo; Shreela Sharma
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.