Literature DB >> 11209581

Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.

M F Kuczmarski1, R J Kuczmarski, M Najjar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare self-reported to measured heights and weights of adults examined in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), and to determine to what extent body mass index (BMI) calculated from self-reported heights and weights affects estimates of overweight prevalence compared with BMI calculated from measured values.
DESIGN: A complex sample design was used in NHANES III to obtain a nationally representative sample of the US civilian, noninstitutionalized population. During household interviews, survey respondents were asked their height and weight. Trained health technicians subsequently measured height and weight using standardized procedures and equipment.
SUBJECTS: The analytical sample consisted of 7,772 men and 8,801 women 20 years old and older. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Only persons with measured and self-reported heights and weights were included in the analysis, and statistical sampling weights were applied. t Tests, Pearson product moment correlation coefficients, sensitivity, and specificity analyses were used to determine the validity of self-reported measurements and prevalence estimates of overweight, defined as BMI of 25 or greater.
RESULTS: Age is an important factor in classifying weight, height, BMI, and overweight from self-reports. Statistically significant differences were found for the mean error (measured-self-reported values) for height and BMI that were notably larger for older age groups. For example, the mean error for height ranged from 2.92 to 4.50 cm for women and from 3.06 to 4.29 cm for men, 70 years and older. Despite the high correlation between measured and self-reported data, the prevalence of overweight calculated from measured values was higher than that calculated from self-reported values among older adults. When calculated with self-reported height, BMI was one unit lower than when calculated from measured height for persons > or = 70 years. Specificity was high but sensitivity decreased with increasing age cohorts. Regression equations are provided to determine actual height from self-reported values for older adults. CONCLUSION/APPLICATIONS: Self-reported heights and weights can be used with younger adults, but they have limitations for older adults, ages > or = 60 years. In research studies and in clinical settings involving older adults, failure to measure height and weight can result in subsequent misclassification of overweight status. Therefore, registered dietitians are encouraged to obtained a measured weight and height using a calibrated scale and stadiometer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11209581     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00008-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  307 in total

1.  Anthropometric measurements and body silhouette of women: validity and perception.

Authors:  B Tehard; M J van Liere; C Com Nougué; F Clavel-Chapelon
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-12

2.  Night eating is associated with emotional and external eating in college students.

Authors:  Laurence J Nolan; Allan Geliebter
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2012-02-10

3.  Agreement between self-reported and measured height, weight and body mass index in old age--a longitudinal study with 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Anna K Dahl; Linda B Hassing; Eleonor I Fransson; Nancy L Pedersen
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  Relationships between body composition analysis measures in Greek women and US white women.

Authors:  Stavroula J Theodorou; Daphne J Theodorou; John Kalef-Ezra; Andreas Fotopoulos; Niki Agnantis; Agathocles Tsatsoulis; Konstantinos Tsampoulas
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in a community-based sample of older African Americans and whites.

Authors:  Gerda G Fillenbaum; Maragatha N Kuchibhatla; Heather E Whitson; Bryan C Batch; Laura P Svetkey; Carl F Pieper; William E Kraus; Harvey J Cohen; Dan G Blazer
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Cardiovascular risk: gender differences in lifestyle behaviors and coping strategies.

Authors:  Luci A Martin; Joseph W Critelli; Joseph A Doster; Catherine Powers; Michael Purdum; Meagen R Doster; Paul L Lambert
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-03

7.  Investigation of complete dental arches of 23 patients aged at least 75 years.

Authors:  Beniamino Volpato; Stefano Di Carlo; Jorida Shahinas; Francesca Mencio; Raimondo Fusco; Giorgio Pompa
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-01-27

8.  Socioeconomic status and risk of diabetes-related mortality in the U.S.

Authors:  Sharon Saydah; Kimberly Lochner
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Regular physical activity moderates cardiometabolic risk in Alzheimer's caregivers.

Authors:  Roland von Känel; Brent T Mausbach; Joel E Dimsdale; Paul J Mills; Thomas L Patterson; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Michael G Ziegler; Susan K Roepke; Alexandrea L Harmell; Matthew Allison; Igor Grant
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Ethnic differences in self-reported and measured obesity.

Authors:  William D Johnson; Claude Bouchard; Robert L Newton; Donna H Ryan; Peter T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 5.002

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.