Literature DB >> 11208838

Lack of prognostic significance of p53 and K-ras mutations in primary resected non-small-cell lung cancer on E4592: a Laboratory Ancillary Study on an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Prospective Randomized Trial of Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy.

J H Schiller1, S Adak, R H Feins, S M Keller, W A Fry, R B Livingston, M E Hammond, B Wolf, L Sabatini, J Jett, L Kohman, D H Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic and predictive significance of p53 and K-ras mutations in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized preoperatively to receive adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy (Arm A) or radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy (Arm B). p53 protein expression was studied by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and p53 mutations in exons 5 to 8 were evaluated by single-strand conformational analysis. K-ras mutations in codons 12, 13, and 61 were determined using engineered restriction fragment length polymorphisms.
RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-eight patients were entered onto E3590; 197 tumors were assessable for analysis. Neither presence nor absence of p53 mutations, p53 protein expression, or K-ras mutations correlated with survival or progression-free survival. There was a trend toward improved survival for patients with wildtype K-ras (median, 42 months) compared with survival of patients with mutant K-ras who were randomized to chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (median, 25 months; P = .09). Multivariate analysis revealed only age and tumor stage to be significant prognostic factors, although there was a trend bordering on statistical significance for K-ras (P = .066). Analysis of survival difference by p53 by single-stranded conformational polymorphism and IHC, interaction of p53 and K-ras, interaction of p53 and treatment arm, nodal station, extent of surgery, weight loss, and histology did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: p53 mutations and protein overexpression are not significant prognostic or predictive factors in resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC. K-ras mutations may be a weak prognostic marker. p53 or K-ras should not be routinely used in the clinical management of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11208838     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.2.448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  49 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in early stage non-small cell lung cancer: tumor based approaches including gene signatures.

Authors:  Simona Carnio; Silvia Novello; Mauro Papotti; Marco Loiacono; Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10

Review 2.  Parameters for individualizing systemic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shirish M Gadgeel; Michele L Cote; Ann G Schwartz; Larry H Matherly; Antoinette Wozniak; Gerold Bepler
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 18.500

3.  Adjuvant therapy following surgery in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Fumihiro Tanaka; Kazue Yoneda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Outcomes by tumor histology and KRAS mutation status after lung stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Raymond H Mak; Gretchen Hermann; John H Lewis; Hugo J W L Aerts; Elizabeth H Baldini; Aileen B Chen; Yolonda L Colson; Fred H Hacker; David Kozono; Jon O Wee; Yu-Hui Chen; Paul J Catalano; Kwok-Kin Wong; David J Sher
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.785

5.  Dependence on the MUC1-C oncoprotein in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Deepak Raina; Michio Kosugi; Rehan Ahmad; Govind Panchamoorthy; Hasan Rajabi; Maroof Alam; Takeshi Shimamura; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Jeffrey Supko; Surender Kharbanda; Donald Kufe
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 6.  Lung cancer. 9: Molecular biology of lung cancer: clinical implications.

Authors:  K M Fong; Y Sekido; A F Gazdar; J D Minna
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Combined assessment of EGFR pathway-related molecular markers and prognosis of NSCLC patients.

Authors:  M I Galleges Ruiz; K Floor; S M Steinberg; K Grünberg; F B J M Thunnissen; J A M Belien; G A Meijer; G J Peters; E F Smit; J A Rodriguez; G Giaccone
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine plus cisplatin compared with observation in completely resected stage IB and II non-small-cell lung cancer: updated survival analysis of JBR-10.

Authors:  Charles A Butts; Keyue Ding; Lesley Seymour; Philip Twumasi-Ankrah; Barbara Graham; David Gandara; David H Johnson; Kenneth A Kesler; Mark Green; Mark Vincent; Yvon Cormier; Glenwood Goss; Brian Findlay; Michael Johnston; Ming-Sound Tsao; Frances A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Two-round coamplification at lower denaturation temperature-PCR (COLD-PCR)-based sanger sequencing identifies a novel spectrum of low-level mutations in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jin Li; Coren A Milbury; Cheng Li; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 10.  Recent progress in predictive biomarkers for metastatic recurrence of human hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Lun-Xiu Qin; Zhao-You Tang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.