Literature DB >> 11208695

Effectiveness of a nonselective ET(A/B) and a selective ET(A) antagonist in rats with monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension.

J F Jasmin1, M Lucas, P Cernacek, J Dupuis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both nonselective ET(A/B) receptor and selective ET(A) receptor antagonists can reduce pulmonary hypertension (PH) and right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) in various animal models. Depending on their net effects after blockade of endothelial and smooth muscle ET(B) receptors, nonselective ET(A/B) antagonists could be more or less effective than selective ET(A) antagonists. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Two weeks after injection of saline or 60 mg/kg monocrotaline (MCT), rats received 50 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) of a selective (LU135252) or nonselective (BSF420627) antagonist for 3 weeks. This resulted in 4 groups: control (n=15), MCT (n=60), MCT+ET(A) (n=39), and MCT+ET(A/B) (n=40). Five-week survival was 35% in the MCT group; this was increased to 56% in the MCT+ET(A) group (P:=0.10) and to 67% in the MCT+ET(A/B) group (P:=0.0015). Drug administration was stopped 48 hours before hemodynamic measurements to evaluate the chronic effects of therapy: PH in the MCT group (RV systolic pressure 87+/-1 mm Hg) was improved similarly in both MCT+ET(A) and MCT+ET(A/B) groups (72+/-3 and 70+/-3 mm Hg, respectively, P:<0.05). Severe RVH in the MCT group (RV/left ventricle+septum weight ratio 73+/-1%) was not affected by the selective antagonist (70+/-2%) but was reduced to 54+/-2% in the MCT+ET(A/B) group (P:<0.01). Pulmonary resistive properties, assessed from isolated lung pressure-flow relationships, were improved similarly in survivors from both treated groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the nonselective ET(A/B) antagonist BSF420627 and the selective ET(A) antagonist LU135252 are effective in this model of PH. Similar direct comparative studies in other models of PH and with various dosage regimens are warranted to define the optimal pharmacological approach of PH when ET receptor antagonists are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11208695     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.103.2.314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  17 in total

Review 1.  How valid are animal models to evaluate treatments for pulmonary hypertension?

Authors:  Maria E Campian; Maxim Hardziyenka; Martin C Michel; Hanno L Tan
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  The PPARγ ligand rosiglitazone attenuates hypoxia-induced endothelin signaling in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Bum-Yong Kang; Jennifer M Kleinhenz; Tamara C Murphy; C Michael Hart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 5.464

3.  Pulmonary hypertension after prolonged hypoxic exposure in mice with a congenital deficiency of Cyp2j.

Authors:  Arkadi Beloiartsev; Maria da Glória Rodrigues-Machado; Guo Ling Zhou; Timothy C Tan; Luca Zazzeron; Robert E Tainsh; Patricio Leyton; Rosemary C Jones; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Warren M Zapol
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.914

4.  Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ and microRNA 98 in Hypoxia-Induced Endothelin-1 Signaling.

Authors:  Bum-Yong Kang; Kathy K Park; Jennifer M Kleinhenz; Tamara C Murphy; David E Green; Kaiser M Bijli; Samantha M Yeligar; Kristal A Carthan; Charles D Searles; Roy L Sutliff; C Michael Hart
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.914

Review 5.  Contrasting actions of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Markus P Schneider; Erika I Boesen; David M Pollock
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.820

6.  Acute endothelin A receptor antagonism improves pulmonary and systemic haemodynamics in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension that is primary or autoimmune and related to congenital heart disease.

Authors:  S C Apostolopoulou; S Rammos; Z S Kyriakides; D J Webb; N R Johnston; D V Cokkinos; D Th Kremastinos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Efficacy of Bosentan in patients after Fontan procedures: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiao-Ke Shang; Rong Lu; Xi Zhang; Chang-Dong Zhang; Shu-Na Xiao; Mei Liu; Bin Wang; Nian-Guo Dong
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-28

8.  Does targeting the lipophilic milieu provide advantages for an endothelin antagonist?

Authors:  David M Pollock; Erika I Boesen; Stephen M Black
Journal:  Mol Interv       Date:  2009-04

9.  Change in pharmacological effect of endothelin receptor antagonists in rats with pulmonary hypertension: role of ETB-receptor expression levels.

Authors:  Stéphanie Sauvageau; Eric Thorin; Louis Villeneuve; Jocelyn Dupuis
Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.410

10.  Ambrisentan for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Brian Casserly; James R Klinger
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.