H E McHaffie1, I A Laing, D J Lloyd. 1. Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. hazel.mchaffie@ed.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore parents' experiences of bereavement care after withdrawal of newborn intensive care. DESIGN: Face to face interviews with 108 parents of 62 babies born over two calendar years in the East of Scotland. RESULTS: Only 22% were seen by six weeks after the death, 10% were not recalled before 6-11 months, and 8% were not seen at all in the first year. All except one couple saw the neonatologist who had cared for their baby. Only 33% remembered a neonatal nurse being present. Most (88%) were seen in the study hospital. Parents highlighted a number of specific needs. Appointments should be: (a) scheduled soon after the death of the baby and certainly within two months of the death irrespective of whether or not autopsy results are available; (b) with the named neonatologist; (c) in a setting away from the hospital if possible. Parents value: (a) efforts to find out how they are coping; (b) full frank information given sensitively to enable them to build up a cohesive picture of what happened and assess their future risks; (c) reassurance where possible, but half truths, false reassurances, and broken promises are unacceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Follow up care is a crucial part of the management of families from whose babies treatment has been withdrawn. Resources devoted to it should be re-examined to provide a service more in tune with parental need. In choosing the place, timing, and conduct of the meeting, staff should be sensitive to the expressed wishes of the parents themselves.
OBJECTIVE: To explore parents' experiences of bereavement care after withdrawal of newborn intensive care. DESIGN: Face to face interviews with 108 parents of 62 babies born over two calendar years in the East of Scotland. RESULTS: Only 22% were seen by six weeks after the death, 10% were not recalled before 6-11 months, and 8% were not seen at all in the first year. All except one couple saw the neonatologist who had cared for their baby. Only 33% remembered a neonatal nurse being present. Most (88%) were seen in the study hospital. Parents highlighted a number of specific needs. Appointments should be: (a) scheduled soon after the death of the baby and certainly within two months of the death irrespective of whether or not autopsy results are available; (b) with the named neonatologist; (c) in a setting away from the hospital if possible. Parents value: (a) efforts to find out how they are coping; (b) full frank information given sensitively to enable them to build up a cohesive picture of what happened and assess their future risks; (c) reassurance where possible, but half truths, false reassurances, and broken promises are unacceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Follow up care is a crucial part of the management of families from whose babies treatment has been withdrawn. Resources devoted to it should be re-examined to provide a service more in tune with parental need. In choosing the place, timing, and conduct of the meeting, staff should be sensitive to the expressed wishes of the parents themselves.
Authors: Kathleen L Meert; Susan Eggly; Murray Pollack; K J S Anand; Jerry Zimmerman; Joseph Carcillo; Christopher J L Newth; J Michael Dean; Douglas F Willson; Carol Nicholson Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Kathleen L Meert; Susan Eggly; Robert A Berg; David L Wessel; Christopher J L Newth; Thomas P Shanley; Rick Harrison; Heidi Dalton; Amy E Clark; J Michael Dean; Allan Doctor; Carol E Nicholson Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Susan Eggly; Kathleen L Meert; John Berger; Jerry Zimmerman; K J S Anand; Christopher J L Newth; Rick Harrison; Joseph Carcillo; J Michael Dean; Douglas F Willson Journal: J Palliat Care Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.250