Literature DB >> 11207106

The process of implementing a community-based peer breast-feeding support programme: the Glasgow experience.

R J McInnes1, D H Stone.   

Abstract

AIM: to document the process of implementing and maintaining a community-based peer-support programme. DESIGN AND
SETTING: a community-based study located in a socio-economically disadvantaged housing estate on the outskirts of Glasgow. PARTICIPANTS: pregnant women residing in a target postcode area. INTERVENTION: a programme of peer counselling and support for breast feeding, comprising antenatal and postnatal home visits over a period of three years. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: peer support may provide an acceptable and appropriate role model for breast-feeding mothers. However, further research is required on other influential factors such as the social network and the impact of this programme on the peer supporter.
CONCLUSIONS: despite a low prevalence of breast feeding, initiating and maintaining peer breast-feeding support was possible. Peer support appeared to be acceptable to mothers and health professionals. Study mothers spoke enthusiastically of the intervention and mentioned increased confidence and self-esteem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11207106     DOI: 10.1054/midw.2000.0236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  14 in total

1.  Breast feeding.

Authors:  A Nicoll; A Williams
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Promoting positive attitudes to breastfeeding: the development and evaluation of a theory-based intervention with school children involving a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Melanie Giles; Samantha Millar; Cherie Armour; Carol McClenahan; John Mallett; Barbara Stewart-Knox
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Reciprocal Peer Support for Post-partum Patients with Diabetes: A Needs Assessment for the Diabetes Buddy Program.

Authors:  M Alexandra Friedman; Charlotte M Niznik; Janelle R Bolden; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-04

Review 4.  A realist review of one-to-one breastfeeding peer support experiments conducted in developed country settings.

Authors:  Heather Trickey; Gill Thomson; Aimee Grant; Julia Sanders; Mala Mann; Simon Murphy; Shantini Paranjothy
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Evaluation of the use of health care assistants to support disadvantaged women breastfeeding in the community.

Authors:  Sarah Beake; Christine McCourt; Cathy Rowan; Jane Taylor
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Views of breastfeeding difficulties among drop-in-clinic attendees.

Authors:  Kirstin Berridge; K McFadden; J Abayomi; J Topping
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Government funded breastfeeding peer support projects: implications for practice.

Authors:  Fiona Dykes
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Establishing individual peer counselling for exclusive breastfeeding in Uganda: implications for scaling-up.

Authors:  Jolly Nankunda; Thorkild Tylleskär; Grace Ndeezi; Nulu Semiyaga; James K Tumwine
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Randomised controlled trial of support from volunteer counsellors for mothers considering breast feeding.

Authors:  Jonathan Graffy; Jane Taylor; Anthony Williams; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-03

10.  Peer-mentoring for first-time mothers from areas of socio-economic disadvantage: a qualitative study within a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christine A Murphy; Margaret E Cupples; Andrew Percy; Henry L Halliday; Moira C Stewart
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.