AIMS: Atrial fibrillation represents a frequent and potentially life-threatening arrhythmia in patients with accessory atrioventricular pathways. Radiofrequency ablation has become the curative treatment of first choice for these patients. Investigations after successful surgical pathway dissection reported an almost complete elimination of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. However, there are only a few reports which include a small number of patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation. The purpose of this study was to examine whether successful radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways prevents the occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and to identify possible predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 116 consecutive patients (mean age 42+/-15 years) with manifest or concealed accessory pathways and documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. The patients were reexamined at 6 and 12 months. Long-term follow-up information was obtained by questionnaire and/or by consulting the referring physician. Pathway conduction was abolished in 101 cases (87%). Late follow-up information was obtained from 91 of these 101 patients (90%) with successful ablation with a mean follow-up duration of 23.9+/-12.3 months. During follow-up, 25 of 91 patients (27%) experienced arrhythmias. Recurrent episodes of atrial fibrillation were observed in 18 of these 25 cases (i.e. 20% of the 91 patients). Differences between patients with and without recurrences of atrial fibrillation were examined for age, sex, associated cardiac disease, presence of multiple pathways, pathway location, atrial fibrillation inducibility during the procedure and cycle length of the atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Only older age was a significant independent predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence (P=0.02). Eleven of 31 patients (35%) older than 50 years of age had atrial fibrillation recurrences during follow-up compared to seven of 60 patients (12%) under age 50. The recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation was even higher in patients older than 60 years (6 of 11 patients, i.e. 55%). In comparison, the occurrence rate of atrial fibrillation during follow-up in a control group of 100 consecutive patients with successful accessory pathway ablation, who did not have evidence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prior to ablation, was 4% and, thus, significantly lower than in the study group of the 91 patients (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after successful radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways shows an age-related increase, being low in patients younger than 50 years of age (12%) and high in the older patients: 35% in patients older than 50 years and 55% in patients older than 60. These results have significant therapeutic implications concerning the decisions on pharmacological therapy after successful ablation in patients older than 50 years. Furthermore, these data will help physicians advise older patients properly about their risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation. Copyright 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.
AIMS: Atrial fibrillation represents a frequent and potentially life-threatening arrhythmia in patients with accessory atrioventricular pathways. Radiofrequency ablation has become the curative treatment of first choice for these patients. Investigations after successful surgical pathway dissection reported an almost complete elimination of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. However, there are only a few reports which include a small number of patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation. The purpose of this study was to examine whether successful radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways prevents the occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and to identify possible predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 116 consecutive patients (mean age 42+/-15 years) with manifest or concealed accessory pathways and documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. The patients were reexamined at 6 and 12 months. Long-term follow-up information was obtained by questionnaire and/or by consulting the referring physician. Pathway conduction was abolished in 101 cases (87%). Late follow-up information was obtained from 91 of these 101 patients (90%) with successful ablation with a mean follow-up duration of 23.9+/-12.3 months. During follow-up, 25 of 91 patients (27%) experienced arrhythmias. Recurrent episodes of atrial fibrillation were observed in 18 of these 25 cases (i.e. 20% of the 91 patients). Differences between patients with and without recurrences of atrial fibrillation were examined for age, sex, associated cardiac disease, presence of multiple pathways, pathway location, atrial fibrillation inducibility during the procedure and cycle length of the atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Only older age was a significant independent predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence (P=0.02). Eleven of 31 patients (35%) older than 50 years of age had atrial fibrillation recurrences during follow-up compared to seven of 60 patients (12%) under age 50. The recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation was even higher in patients older than 60 years (6 of 11 patients, i.e. 55%). In comparison, the occurrence rate of atrial fibrillation during follow-up in a control group of 100 consecutive patients with successful accessory pathway ablation, who did not have evidence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prior to ablation, was 4% and, thus, significantly lower than in the study group of the 91 patients (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after successful radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways shows an age-related increase, being low in patients younger than 50 years of age (12%) and high in the older patients: 35% in patients older than 50 years and 55% in patients older than 60. These results have significant therapeutic implications concerning the decisions on pharmacological therapy after successful ablation in patients older than 50 years. Furthermore, these data will help physicians advise older patients properly about their risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation. Copyright 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.
Authors: Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Elsayed Z Soliman; Paul D Sorlie; Nona Sotoodehnia; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; David Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Pamela J Schreiner; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jonas H Schwieler; Sharon Zlochiver; Sandeep V Pandit; Omer Berenfeld; José Jalife; Lennart Bergfeldt Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 6.343