BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The synthetic flexible tri-leaflet heart valve offers considerable potential for improvement in both hydrodynamic and biomechanical performance of replacement heart valves. To date, success with the synthetic leaflet heart valve has been limited, partly due to limitations in the biostability of the polyurethanes used. With the synthesis of new biostable polyurethanes, the integration of advancing technology, and better knowledge of the functional and biomechanical design requirements necessary to increase the long-term durability of the polyurethane heart valve, novel clinical solutions are now in sight. METHODS: This study describes the design characteristics, hydrodynamic and biomechanical performance of a new design of polyurethane heart valve. The function and durability characteristics of this novel design of heart valve, manufactured using a proven durable non-biostable polyurethane, was compared with that of a single AorTech porcine bioprosthetic heart valve and a single tilting disc mechanical heart valve, the Björk-Shiley Monostrut valve (BSM), of similar size. RESULTS: For equivalent sizes of valve, the new polyurethane heart valve design had significantly lower pressure gradients compared with the porcine valve at all flow rates and to the BSM valve at the higher flow rates. The effective orifice area of the polyurethane valve was greater than the other two valves studied; regurgitation and total energy loss were less. The new polyurethane valve design reached over 360 million cycles in an accelerated durability tester, without failure. CONCLUSION: This new design of polyurethane heart valve showed improved hydrodynamic function in comparison with either the porcine bioprosthetic or the BSM mechanical heart valve. The pulsatile flow results showed a lower total energy loss associated with this valve, indicating improved potential patient benefit. The durability of this new design of polyurethane heart valve was demonstrated when manufactured using a medical-grade polyurethane.
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The synthetic flexible tri-leaflet heart valve offers considerable potential for improvement in both hydrodynamic and biomechanical performance of replacement heart valves. To date, success with the synthetic leaflet heart valve has been limited, partly due to limitations in the biostability of the polyurethanes used. With the synthesis of new biostable polyurethanes, the integration of advancing technology, and better knowledge of the functional and biomechanical design requirements necessary to increase the long-term durability of the polyurethane heart valve, novel clinical solutions are now in sight. METHODS: This study describes the design characteristics, hydrodynamic and biomechanical performance of a new design of polyurethane heart valve. The function and durability characteristics of this novel design of heart valve, manufactured using a proven durable non-biostable polyurethane, was compared with that of a single AorTech porcine bioprosthetic heart valve and a single tilting disc mechanical heart valve, the Björk-Shiley Monostrut valve (BSM), of similar size. RESULTS: For equivalent sizes of valve, the new polyurethane heart valve design had significantly lower pressure gradients compared with the porcine valve at all flow rates and to the BSM valve at the higher flow rates. The effective orifice area of the polyurethane valve was greater than the other two valves studied; regurgitation and total energy loss were less. The new polyurethane valve design reached over 360 million cycles in an accelerated durability tester, without failure. CONCLUSION: This new design of polyurethane heart valve showed improved hydrodynamic function in comparison with either the porcine bioprosthetic or the BSM mechanical heart valve. The pulsatile flow results showed a lower total energy loss associated with this valve, indicating improved potential patient benefit. The durability of this new design of polyurethane heart valve was demonstrated when manufactured using a medical-grade polyurethane.
Authors: Richard L Li; Jonathan Russ; Costas Paschalides; Giovanni Ferrari; Haim Waisman; Jeffrey W Kysar; David Kalfa Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Géraldine M Baer; Thomas S Wilson; Ward Small; Jonathan Hartman; William J Benett; Dennis L Matthews; Duncan J Maitland Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: J M García Páez; A Carrera; E Jorge; I Millán; A Cordón; A Rocha; M Maestro; J L Castillo-Olivares Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2006-11-30 Impact factor: 4.727