Literature DB >> 11206614

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: outcomes equivalent to open surgery.

B R Lee1, G K Chow, L E Ratner, L R Kavoussi.   

Abstract

A shortage of kidney donors has contributed to the interest in laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. Three transperitoneal ports are used, as is an AESOP robot. To maintain urine flow, the donor is kept volume expanded during the procedure, and the pneumoperitoneum pressure is minimized. The most critical and hazardous part of the surgery is dissection of the renal artery and vein. Abundant periureteral tissue should be left to protect the blood supply. Harvest of the right kidney is more difficult. Placing the extraction incision in the right upper quadrant and using a Satinsky clamp instead of a stapling device at the origin of the renal vein will provide maximum venous length and help prevent postoperative thrombosis of the allograft. In the first 175 laparoscopic renal harvest procedures at Johns Hopkins, the complication rate was 14%, the rate of open conversion was 2%, and 3% of the patients required transfusions. These rates improved with experience. There was no significant difference in the performance of the allografts or the recovery of the recipients from what is seen after open kidney harvest. Wider acceptance of laparoscopic renal harvest will increase the number of donors and will be helped by development of methods and devices that shorten the learning curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11206614     DOI: 10.1089/end.2000.14.811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Li-Ming Su; Lloyd E Ratner; Robert A Montgomery; Thomas W Jarrett; Bruce J Trock; Vladimir Sinkov; Rachel Bluebond-Langner; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Toward greater adoption of minimally invasive and nephron-sparing surgical techniques for renal cell cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Matthew P Banegas; Linda C Harlan; Bhupinder Mann; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open nephrectomies in living donors.

Authors:  Amer Rajab; John E Mahoney; Mitchell L Henry; Elmahdi A Elkhammas; Ginny L Bumgardner; Ronald M Ferguson; Ronald P Pelletier
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.089

4. 

Authors:  Jeff Warren; Vitor da Silva; Yves Caumartin; Patrick P W Luke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Clipless management of the renal vein during hand-assist laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Gregory S Rosenblatt; Michael J Conlin
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy in xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis.

Authors:  Murad Asali; Alexander Tsivian
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-08-05

7.  [Not Available].

Authors:  G Gaurav; K Santosh; A Samiran; G Ganesh
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.407

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.