Literature DB >> 11206600

Efficacy and response time to sertraline versus fluoxetine in the treatment of unipolar major depressive disorder.

R A Suri1, L L Altshuler, N L Rasgon, J L Calcagno, M A Frye, M J Gitlin, S Hwang, J Zuckerbrow-Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the treatment efficacy of the 2 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors sertraline and fluoxetine.
METHOD: A randomized, single-blind, parallel-group study of 10 weeks' duration comparing the efficacy of sertraline, 50 mg/day; sertraline, 100 mg/day; and fluoxetine, 20 mg/day, was conducted in 44 psychiatric outpatients with DSM-IV unipolar major depressive disorder. Antidepressant dosages were doubled at 6 weeks for subjects who had not achieved remission. Primary outcome measurements included the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I), with scores of < or = 7 on the HAM-D and < or = 2 on the CGI-I representing a positive treatment response, i.e., remission.
RESULTS: At 4 weeks, significant differences in rate of positive treatment response were noted, with 0% for sertraline, 50 mg; 46% for sertraline, 100 mg; and 31% for fluoxetine, 20 mg (p = .023). At 6 weeks, positive treatment response rates were 21%, 43%, and 31% for subjects taking 50 mg of sertraline, those taking 100 mg of sertraline, and those taking 20 mg of fluoxetine, respectively, with treatment groups no longer differing significantly from each other. In subjects for whom antidepressant dose was doubled at week 6, response rates at week 10 (4 weeks on increased dose) were 40% for sertraline, 100 mg; 43% for sertraline, 200 mg; and 55% for fluoxetine, 40 mg.
CONCLUSION: Subjects taking sertraline, 100 mg, and fluoxetine, 20 mg, demonstrated an earlier treatment response compared with subjects taking sertraline, 50 mg. For patients without a positive response at 6 weeks, an increased antidepressant dose resulted in remission for a substantial proportion of patients when assessed 4 weeks later.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11206600     DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v61n1209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  5 in total

Review 1.  Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New Generation Antidepressants.

Authors:  Ai Leng Khoo; Hui Jun Zhou; Monica Teng; Liang Lin; Ying Jiao Zhao; Lay Beng Soh; Yee Ming Mok; Boon Peng Lim; Kok Peng Gwee
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  Sertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Andrea Cipriani; Teresa La Ferla; Toshi A Furukawa; Alessandra Signoretti; Atsuo Nakagawa; Rachel Churchill; Hugh McGuire; Corrado Barbui
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

3.  Response to sertraline is influenced by GNβ3 gene G-350A variant in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Dena Firouzabadi; Negar Firouzabadi; Kiana Kalani; Kamyar Zomorrodian; Elham Shirazi Tehrani
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.

Authors:  A Cipriani; P Brambilla; T Furukawa; J Geddes; M Gregis; M Hotopf; L Malvini; C Barbui
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

5.  Peripheral thyroid hormones and response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Authors:  Michael Gitlin; Lori L Altshuler; Mark A Frye; Rita Suri; Emily L Huynh; Lynn Fairbanks; Michael Bauer; Stanley Korenman
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.186

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.