Literature DB >> 11206189

The biopharmaceutical aspects of nasal mucoadhesive drug delivery.

M I Ugwoke1, N Verbeke, R Kinget.   

Abstract

Nasal drug administration has frequently been proposed as the most feasible alternative to parenteral injections. This is due to the high permeability of the nasal epithelium, allowing a higher molecular mass cut-off at approximately 1000 Da, and the rapid drug absorption rate with plasma drug profiles sometimes almost identical to those from intravenous injections. Despite the potential of nasal drug delivery, it has a number of limitations. In this review, the anatomy and physiology of the nasal cavity, as well as ciliary beating and mucociliary clearance as they relate to nasal drug absorption, are introduced. The rationale for nasal drug delivery and its limitations, some factors that influence nasal drug absorption, and the experimental models used in nasal drug delivery research are also reviewed. Nasal mucoadhesion as a promising method of nasal absorption enhancement is discussed, and factors that influence mucoadhesion, as well as safety of nasal mucoadhesive drug delivery systems are reviewed in detail. Nasal drug administration is presently mostly used for local therapies within the nasal cavity. Anti-allergic drugs and nasal decongestants are the most common examples. However, nasal drug administration for systemic effects has been practised since ancient times. Nasally-administered psychotropic drugs by native Americans, the use of tobacco snuffs, and nasal administration of illicit drugs such as cocaine are all well known (Illum & Davis 1992). Nowadays, the nasal cavity is being actively explored for systemic administration of other therapeutic agents, particularly peptides and proteins (Illum 1992; Edman & Björk 1992), as well as for immunization purposes (Lemoine et al 1998). To better understand the basis for nasal drug absorption and factors that can influence it, a brief review of the anatomy and physiology of the nose is appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11206189     DOI: 10.1211/0022357011775145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol        ISSN: 0022-3573            Impact factor:   3.765


  36 in total

Review 1.  Delivering non-hormonal contraceptives to men: advances and obstacles.

Authors:  Dolores D Mruk; C Yan Cheng
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 2.  Non-invasive delivery strategies for biologics.

Authors:  Aaron C Anselmo; Yatin Gokarn; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Nanosuspension based in situ gelling nasal spray of carvedilol: development, in vitro and in vivo characterization.

Authors:  Nilesh S Saindane; Kunal P Pagar; Pradeep R Vavia
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Development of carbamazepine transnasal microemulsion for treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  Sheetal Porecha Acharya; K Pundarikakshudu; Ashish Panchal; Anita Lalwani
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Development and characterization of mucoadhesive in situ nasal gel of midazolam prepared with Ficus carica mucilage.

Authors:  Shyamoshree Basu; Amal Kumar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Preliminary brain-targeting studies on intranasal mucoadhesive microemulsions of sumatriptan.

Authors:  Tushar K Vyas; A K Babbar; R K Sharma; Shashi Singh; Ambikanandan Misra
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Evaluation of glycofurol-based gel as a new vehicle for topical application of naproxen.

Authors:  Nahla Salah Barakat
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.246

8.  Insoluble powder formulation as an effective nasal drug delivery system.

Authors:  Fusashi Ishikawa; Mika Murano; Minoru Hiraishi; Toshikazu Yamaguchi; Ikumi Tamai; Akira Tsuji
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Stroke, dementia, and drug delivery.

Authors:  G A Ford; C A Bryant; A A Mangoni; S H D Jackson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Intranasal cabergoline: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies.

Authors:  Gitanjali Sharma; Anil Kumar Mishra; Pushpa Mishra; Ambikanandan Misra
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.