BACKGROUND: Indexation to fat-free mass (FFM) seems to be the best option for adjusting left ventricular (LV) mass. However, measurements of FFM are frequently not available. OBJECTIVES: To define the relation of FFM with commonly available anthropometric measures in order to derive an approximation formula of FFM that can be used for valid indexation of LV mass. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,371 subjects from a community survey were examined by echocardiography to measure LV mass and by bioelectrical impedance analyses (BIA) for the determination of FFM. An approximation of FFM was generated in a healthy subgroup of 213 men and 291 women by non-linear regression techniques. RESULTS: Compared with body height, height2.0, height2.7, (the superscripts following weight and height are raised powers used as a more appropriate method for indexing LV mass) or body surface area, FFM measured by BIA in the healthy subgroups was best predicted by gender-specific equations of the form: FFM = 5.1 x height1.14 x weight0.41 for men and FFM = 5.34 x height1.47 x weight0.33 for women. In the healthy reference group, indexation of LV mass for BIA-determined FFM and approximated FFM (FFMa), respectively, equally eliminated gender differences in LV mass and markedly reduced the influence of body mass index without affecting the associations between blood pressure and LV mass. Validation of FFMa in two independent population-based samples, aged 52 to 67 years, of the same source population confirmed that LV mass indexed by FFMa produced results that were highly consistent with those obtained with indexation by BIA-determined FFM. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a novel approximation of FFM based on exponentials of body height and weight. It performed well in the indexation of LV mass in middle-aged men and women of this study. Evaluation of the equation in other populations should be awaited before its use is recommended in situations where direct determination of FFM is not possible.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Indexation to fat-free mass (FFM) seems to be the best option for adjusting left ventricular (LV) mass. However, measurements of FFM are frequently not available. OBJECTIVES: To define the relation of FFM with commonly available anthropometric measures in order to derive an approximation formula of FFM that can be used for valid indexation of LV mass. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,371 subjects from a community survey were examined by echocardiography to measure LV mass and by bioelectrical impedance analyses (BIA) for the determination of FFM. An approximation of FFM was generated in a healthy subgroup of 213 men and 291 women by non-linear regression techniques. RESULTS: Compared with body height, height2.0, height2.7, (the superscripts following weight and height are raised powers used as a more appropriate method for indexing LV mass) or body surface area, FFM measured by BIA in the healthy subgroups was best predicted by gender-specific equations of the form: FFM = 5.1 x height1.14 x weight0.41 for men and FFM = 5.34 x height1.47 x weight0.33 for women. In the healthy reference group, indexation of LV mass for BIA-determined FFM and approximated FFM (FFMa), respectively, equally eliminated gender differences in LV mass and markedly reduced the influence of body mass index without affecting the associations between blood pressure and LV mass. Validation of FFMa in two independent population-based samples, aged 52 to 67 years, of the same source population confirmed that LV mass indexed by FFMa produced results that were highly consistent with those obtained with indexation by BIA-determined FFM. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a novel approximation of FFM based on exponentials of body height and weight. It performed well in the indexation of LV mass in middle-aged men and women of this study. Evaluation of the equation in other populations should be awaited before its use is recommended in situations where direct determination of FFM is not possible.
Authors: Evrim B Turkbey; Robyn L McClelland; Richard A Kronmal; Gregory L Burke; Diane E Bild; Russell P Tracy; Andrew E Arai; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-03
Authors: Susan B Yeon; Carol J Salton; Philimon Gona; Michael L Chuang; Susan J Blease; Yuchi Han; Connie W Tsao; Peter G Danias; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Warren J Manning Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Siddique A Abbasi; John Eng; Colin Wu; Pamela Ouyang; Raymond Y Kwong; Allison Goldfine; David A Bluemke; Joao Lima; Michael Jerosch-Herold Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 7.804
Authors: Farhad Pishgar; Mahsima Shabani; Thiago Quinaglia A C Silva; David A Bluemke; Matthew Budoff; R Graham Barr; Matthew A Allison; Wendy S Post; João A C Lima; Shadpour Demehri Journal: Radiology Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: Hubert Krysztofiak; Marcel Młyńczak; Łukasz A Małek; Andrzej Folga; Wojciech Braksator Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ana Azevedo; Paulo Bettencourt; Pedro B Almeida; Ana C Santos; Cassiano Abreu-Lima; Hans-Werner Hense; Henrique Barros Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2007-06-07 Impact factor: 2.298