INTRODUCTION: The electrophysiologic mechanism of intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is generally thought to be a macroreentrant circuit revolving around a nonconductive or highly anisotropic barrier. However, the electrical and anatomic substrate that supports these circuits has been incompletely defined. Our objectives were to characterize the atria of patients with IART using electroanatomic mapping in sinus or atrially paced rhythm and to determine whether electrical barriers identified in sinus/atrially paced rhythm are associated with IART circuits. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighteen patients with IART and a remote history of repaired or palliated congenital heart disease were studied [8 biventricular repair, 8 single ventricle palliation (7 Fontan), and 2 Mustard repair]. Thirteen patients had a right AV valve. In sinus/atrially paced rhythm, electrical evidence of a crista terminalis was identified in 11 patients, an atriotomy in 12, and > or = 1 right atrial free-wall scar in 11. In 26 IART circuits characterized, 12 used the right AV valve as a central obstacle, 6 used a right atrial free-wall scar, 3 used an atriotomy, 3 used the crista terminalis, and 2 circuits used an atrial septal scar. All central obstacles used by IART circuits were identified in sinus/atrially paced rhythm. CONCLUSION: The crista terminalis, atriotomy, and right atrial scars can be identified in patients with repaired congenital heart disease by electroanatomic mapping in sinus/atrially paced rhythm. These conduction barriers frequently function as the central obstacle for IART. Demonstration of such features may help focus investigational mapping without reliance on spontaneous initiation of the tachycardia.
INTRODUCTION: The electrophysiologic mechanism of intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is generally thought to be a macroreentrant circuit revolving around a nonconductive or highly anisotropic barrier. However, the electrical and anatomic substrate that supports these circuits has been incompletely defined. Our objectives were to characterize the atria of patients with IART using electroanatomic mapping in sinus or atrially paced rhythm and to determine whether electrical barriers identified in sinus/atrially paced rhythm are associated with IART circuits. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighteen patients with IART and a remote history of repaired or palliated congenital heart disease were studied [8 biventricular repair, 8 single ventricle palliation (7 Fontan), and 2 Mustard repair]. Thirteen patients had a right AV valve. In sinus/atrially paced rhythm, electrical evidence of a crista terminalis was identified in 11 patients, an atriotomy in 12, and > or = 1 right atrial free-wall scar in 11. In 26 IART circuits characterized, 12 used the right AV valve as a central obstacle, 6 used a right atrial free-wall scar, 3 used an atriotomy, 3 used the crista terminalis, and 2 circuits used an atrial septal scar. All central obstacles used by IART circuits were identified in sinus/atrially paced rhythm. CONCLUSION: The crista terminalis, atriotomy, and right atrial scars can be identified in patients with repaired congenital heart disease by electroanatomic mapping in sinus/atrially paced rhythm. These conduction barriers frequently function as the central obstacle for IART. Demonstration of such features may help focus investigational mapping without reliance on spontaneous initiation of the tachycardia.
Authors: Róbert Pap; Mária Kohári; Attila Makai; Gábor Bencsik; Vassil Borislavov Traykov; Rodrigo Gallardo; Gergely Klausz; Kis Zsuzsanna; Tamás Forster; László Sághy Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 1.900