Literature DB >> 11203866

The effect of tooth preparation on microleakage behavior.

J A von Fraunhofer1, E I Adachi, D M Barnes, E Romberg.   

Abstract

Many factors contribute to the microleakage of a restoration. One of the more important is the method of cavity preparation. This study compared the microleakage behavior of composite restorations placed in cavities prepared by different techniques. It also compared and correlated the microleakage data produced by an electrochemical vs a staining technique. Class V cavities were prepared in 48 premolars by four techniques: (1) tungsten carbide bur in a high-speed handpiece followed by acid etching; (2) air abrasion (27 microns Al2O3) followed by acid etching; (3) air abrasion (50 microns Al2O3) and (4) air abrasion (27 microns Al2O3), with n = 12 in each group. All teeth were restored with Prime and Bond 2.1 and Tetric Flow, then thermocycled between 5 degrees and 55 degrees C for 5000 cycles with a one minute dwell at each temperature. After thermocycling, a PVC-covered Cu wire was inserted apically into the pulp chamber of each tooth and sealed into position. Leakage was continuously followed by a conductimetric method for 75 days. The teeth then were immersed in 50% AgNO3 for two hours, rinsed in distilled water for 60 seconds, then placed in a rapid photographic developer solution for two hours, followed by rinsing and sectioning for microscopic examination. Electrochemical data were examined by ANOVA and Newman-Keuls multiple comparison tests, while Kruskal-Wallis and Rank Sum Difference tests were used on the staining evaluations. Spearman's rho test was used to correlate the two test techniques. Electrochemical data for cavities prepared with a bur or air abrasion followed by acid etching prior to restoration showed significantly less (p < or = 0.05) microleakage (mean leakage currents of 1.89 &amp; 1.57 microA, respectively) than teeth prepared with air abrasion alone (mean leakage currents of 3.60 &amp; 3.40 microA, respectively). Rank sum AgNO3 staining data (196 &amp; 242 vs 371 &amp; 368) supported these findings. The correlation between the electrochemical and staining data was significant (p < or = 0.05) for all four groups of test specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11203866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  4 in total

1.  Influence of the methodology and evaluation criteria on determining microleakage in dentin-restorative interfaces.

Authors:  Denise Arliane Amarante de Camargo; Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Manoel Damião de Sousa Neto; Simonides Consani
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A comparative evaluation of dentinal hypersensitivity and microleakage associated with composite restorations in cavities preconditioned with air abrasion - An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ankit Arora; Shashi Rashmi Acharya; Saraswathi M Vidya; Padmaja Sharma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-07

3.  Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment.

Authors:  Juliana Abdallah Atoui; Michelle Alexandra Chinelatti; Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb; Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Effects of adding silica particles on certain properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.

Authors:  Nayef H Felemban; Mohamed I Ebrahim
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.