Literature DB >> 11203817

Effect of food-simulating liquids on the flexural strength of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives.

A U Yap1, D T Tan, B K Goh, H G Kuah, M Goh.   

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of food-simulating liquids on composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives. Three composite (Z100, Spectrum TPH, and Tetric Ceram) and three polyacid-modified composite (F2000, Dyract AP, and Compoglass) restoratives from the same manufacturers were selected for the study. Flexural strength specimens (25 x 2 x 2 mm) based on ISO 4049 specifications were fabricated according to the manufacturers recommendations. After light polymerization, the specimens were removed from their molds and conditioned for one week at 37 degrees C in the following mediums: (1) deionized water, (2) 0.02 M citric acid, (3) heptane, and (4) 50% ethanol-water solution. Specimens stored in air were used as controls. The sample size was five for each material-medium combination. After conditioning, the specimens were blotted dry, measured, and subjected to flexural strength testing using an Instron Universal Testing Machine with a crosshead speed of 0.05 mm/minute. With the exception of Compoglass, flexural strength of all restoratives after conditioning in heptane was significantly greater than that after conditioning in all other mediums and the control. Although no significant difference in flexural strength values was observed between the different restoratives when the materials were conditioned in heptane or air (control), significant differences were observed between the different restoratives after conditioning in aqueous solutions (water, citric acid, and ethanol-water solution). The flexural strengths of the composites were generally significantly higher than their polyacid-modified counterparts after conditioning in the various aqueous solutions. The detrimental effects of aqueous solutions on flexural strength appeared to be greater with polyacid-modified composite resins than with composite restoratives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11203817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  7 in total

1.  Shear punch strength evaluation of nanocomposite and compomer, post-conditioning in dietary solvents - An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Harsimran Kaur; Harpreet Singh; K S Vinod; Baldeep Singh; Rachita Arora; Sayan Chatopaddhya
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-03-27

2.  Effect of Food Simulating Agents on the Hardness and Bond Strength of a Silicone Soft Liner to a Denture Base Acrylic Resin.

Authors:  A A R Khaledi; M Bahrani; S Shirzadi
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-12-23

3.  Evaluation of the Flexural Strength of Interim Restorative Materials in Fixed Prosthodontics.

Authors:  Hanieh Mehrpour; Ehsan Farjood; Rashin Giti; Alireza Barfi Ghasrdashti; Hossein Heidari
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2016-09

4.  A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation.

Authors:  Hanaa El Attar; Omnia Elhiny; Ghada Salem; Ahmed Abdelrahman; Mazen Attia
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-21

5.  Effect of food simulating liquids on the flexural strength of a methacrylate and silorane-based composite.

Authors:  Ehsan Mohammadi; Leila Pishevar; Parvin Mirzakouchaki Boroujeni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact of dietary solvents on flexural properties of bulk-fill composites.

Authors:  Ahmed Hesham Eweis; Adrian U-Jin Yap; Noor Azlin Yahya
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2018-05-05

7.  Effect of dietary solvents on the strength of nanocomposite, compomer, glass ionomer cement: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Harsimran Kaur; B Nandlal
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.