Literature DB >> 11203611

Bond strength of denture teeth to denture base resins.

Y Takahashi1, J Chai, T Takahashi, T Habu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study examined the bond strength between 2 types of denture teeth and 3 denture base resins. The denture teeth were untreated, prepared with diatorics, or treated with dichloromethane, a solvent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional denture teeth and cross-linked denture teeth were bonded to either a heat-cured denture base resin, a microwave-cured denture base resin, or a pour-type denture base resin. Compressive load was applied at 45 degrees on the palatal surface of each tooth until fracture.
RESULTS: Conventional resin teeth possessed higher bond strength than cross-linked denture teeth. The heat-cured denture base resin significantly surpassed the microwave-cured denture base resin in bond strength. Both materials were better than the pour-type resin. The application of dichloromethane resulted in a significantly better improvement in bond strength compared to the use of diatorics.
CONCLUSION: It is recommended that dichloromethane be applied on the denture teeth ridge-lap area prior to denture base processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11203611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  17 in total

1.  Bond of acrylic teeth to different denture base resins after various surface-conditioning methods.

Authors:  Reinhold Lang; Carola Kolbeck; Rainer Bergmann; Gerhard Handel; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Influence of Surface Modifications of Acrylic Resin Teeth on Shear Bond Strength with Denture Base Resin-An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Vallabh Mahadevan; Madhusudan Krishnan; Chitra Shankar Krishnan; N S Azhagarasan; Jayakrishnakumar Sampathkumar; Hariharan Ramasubramanian
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-09-01

3.  Shear bond strength between light polymerized hard reline resin and denture base resin subjected to long term water immersion.

Authors:  Mohammad Q Al Rifaiy
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2011-11-20

4.  Effect of various chemicals on the bond strength of acrylic tooth and denture base -An Invitro comparative study.

Authors:  V Pridhvi Krishna; Averneni Premalatha; P Jithendra Babu; D Srinivasa Raju; M Praveen Kumar; D Bheemalingeswara Rao
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-02-26

5.  The effect of different chemical surface treatments of denture teeth on shear bond strength: a comparative study.

Authors:  Gauravi Jain; Umesh Palekar; Vaibav Awinashe; Sunil Kumar Mishra; Abhishek Kawadkar; Tripti Rahangdale
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

6.  The bond between acrylic resin denture teeth and the denture base: recommendations for best practice.

Authors:  D R Radford; A S Juszczyk; R K F Clark
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Tensile bond strength of four denture resins to porcelain teeth with different surface treatment.

Authors:  Mohamed El-Sheikh; John Powers
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of denture teeth to denture base resins.

Authors:  Farideh Bahrani; Amir Ali Reza Khaledi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-01

9.  A comparison of shear bond strength of ceramic and resin denture teeth on different acrylic resin bases.

Authors:  Massimo Corsalini; Daniela Di Venere; Francesco Pettini; Gianluca Stefanachi; Santo Catapano; Antonio Boccaccio; Luciano Lamberti; Carmine Pappalettere; Stefano Carossa
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-12-29

10.  Evaluation of Bond Strength of Acrylic Teeth to Denture Base using Different Polymerization Techniques: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Naveen S Yadav; Surabhi Somkuwar; Sunil Kumar Mishra; Puja Hazari; Rajkiran Chitumalla; Shilpi K Pandey
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.