Literature DB >> 11202321

Recovery of mandibular motion after closed and open treatment of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures.

G S Throckmorton1, E Ellis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of recovery of mandibular motion in patients treated for fractures of the mandibular condylar process. One hundred and thirty-six patients (111 men, 25 women), 74 treated by closed and 62 by open methods, were included. They underwent testing of mandibular and condyle mobility at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years post surgery. Their ranges of motion were compared to those of 52 controls (26 men and 26 women). A jaw-tracking device was used to assess mandibular motion. Multilevel statistical models were used to assess differences between groups, and to estimate rate of recovery in the fracture patients. In general, patients with unilateral fractures of the condylar process had maximum excursions that returned to normal values within 3 years after fracture, regardless of treatment. Patients treated open exhibited a faster rate of improvement in maximum interincisal opening than patients treated closed (0.43 mm/month vs 0.15 mm/month, respectively), but part of the difference was due to a significantly smaller opening after 6 weeks for the patients treated open (38 mm vs 42 mm, respectively). Patients treated open also exhibited a faster rate of improvement in maximum excursion toward the fracture side than patients treated closed (0.10 mm/month vs 0.04 mm/month, respectively). Based upon this study, patients with unilateral fractures of the condylar process, who are treated closed and not put into maxillomandibular fixation but are instructed in physical therapy, can be expected to achieve normal maximum excursions within 3 years after treatment. Patients treated open will have reduced maximum opening initially, but may reach normal levels of opening sooner than patients treated without surgery. Patients treated without surgery may have smaller than normal excursion toward the non-fracture side for at least 3 years after fracture, especially if their fracture was at or above the condylar neck. Improvement rates for other maximum excursions are similar for patients treated with or without surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11202321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  13 in total

1.  Retraction force necessary to expose the mandibular neck in Risdon and high cervical anteroparotid transmasseteric approaches: an anatomic comparative study.

Authors:  Jérôme Adnot; Aliosha Feuss; Fabrice Duparc; Olivier Trost
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Applications of the endoscope in facial fracture management.

Authors:  Chen Lee; Marcin Czerwinski
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Pearls of mandibular trauma management.

Authors:  John C Koshy; Evan M Feldman; Chuma J Chike-Obi; Jamal M Bullocks
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Evaluation of mechanical resistance after fixation of mandibular condylar fracture with single and double miniplates: a comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  Kapil Kurtadikar; Nikhil Singhvi; Jayaprasad N Shetty; Omkar Shetye; Mueedul Islam; Hari Keerthy
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-08-13

5.  [Transparotidean approach to surgical management of condylar neck fractures. A prospective study].

Authors:  A Vogt; M Roser; D Weingart
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-07

6.  [Causation, therapy and complications of treating mandibular fractures - a retrospective analysis of 10 years].

Authors:  R Depprich; J Handschel; J Hornung; U Meyer; N R Kübler
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

7.  Unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures: a retrospective clinical comparison of open versus closed treatment.

Authors:  Renata Porto Stypulkowski; Aline Gama Santos; Elvidio de Paula E Silva; Cícero André da Costa Moraes; Everton Luis Santos da Rosa
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-05-08

8.  Evaluation of Retro Mandibular Approach to Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Condylar Fractures: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  J K Dayashankara Rao; Neelima Gehlot; Vijay Siwach
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-06

9.  Prospective closed treatment of nondisplaced and nondislocated condylar neck and head fractures versus open reposition internal fixation of displaced and dislocated fractures.

Authors:  Constantin A Landes; Kai Day; Ruben Lipphardt; Robert Sader
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-07

10.  Functional evaluation in orthodontic surgical treatment: long-term stability and predictability.

Authors:  Giampietro Farronato; Lucia Giannini; Guido Galbiati; Santo Andrea Stabilini; Michele Sarcina; Cinzia Maspero
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.