Literature DB >> 11202318

Comparative examination of the accuracy of a mechanical and an optical system in CT and MRT based instrument navigation.

S Hassfeld1, J Mühling.   

Abstract

The aim of an intraoperative instrument navigation system is to support the surgeon in the localization of anatomical regions and to guide the use of surgical instruments. An overview of technical principles and literature reports on various navigation systems is provided here. The navigation accuracy (tested on a plastic phantom under simulated operating room conditions) of the mechanical Viewing Wand system and the optical SPOCS system amounts to 1 to 3 mm for computerized tomography (CT) data, with a significant inverse dependence on the layer thickness. The values for magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) data are significantly higher. In regard to the choice of registration points, a statistically inverse dependence exists between the number of points and the distance between the points. During the time period between autumn 1993 and mid-1999, more than 120 clinical applications were performed. The intraoperative accuracy was in the range of < or = 3 mm. Registering the patient position with preoperatively inserted screw markers achieved accuracy values of < or = 2 mm. The instrument navigation technique has proved to be very advantageous for the spatial orientation of the surgeons. The possibility of checking resection borders has opened up new perspectives in tumor surgery. A quality improvement and a reduction of the operational risks as well as a considerable decline in the stress placed on the patient can be expected in the near future due the techniques of computer-assisted surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11202318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  Navigation-assisted sclerotherapy of orbital venolymphatic malformation: a new guidance technique for percutaneous treatment of low-flow vascular malformations.

Authors:  Ulrike Ernemann; Carsten Westendorff; Dirk Troitzsch; Jürgen Hoffmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Navigational maxillofacial surgery using virtual models.

Authors:  B Hohlweg-Majert; Ralf Schön; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  AngleNav: MEMS Tracker to Facilitate CT-Guided Puncture.

Authors:  Rui Li; Sheng Xu; William F Pritchard; John W Karanian; Venkatesh P Krishnasamy; Bradford J Wood; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Photoacoustic and fluorescence image-guided surgery using a multifunctional targeted nanoprobe.

Authors:  Lei Xi; Guangyin Zhou; Ning Gao; Lily Yang; David A Gonzalo; Steven J Hughes; Huabei Jiang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Image-guided surgery and medical robotics in the cranial area.

Authors:  G Widmann
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-01-01

6.  Using Free Navigation Reference Points and Prefabricated Bone Plates for Zygoma Fracture Model Surgeries.

Authors:  Tien-Hsiang Wang; Hsu Ma; Ching-Shiow Tseng; Yi-Hong Chou; Kun-Lin Cai
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 1.553

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.