Literature DB >> 11202102

Comparing the German versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist.

H Klasen1, W Woerner, D Wolke, R Meyer, S Overmeyer, W Kaschnitz, A Rothenberger, R Goodman.   

Abstract

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire that can be completed in about 5 minutes by the parents and teachers of 4-16 year olds. The scores of the English version correlate well with those of the considerably longer Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). The present study compares the German versions of the questionnaires. Both SDQ and CBCL were completed by the parents of 273 children drawn from psychiatric clinics (N = 163) and from a community sample (N = 110). The children from the community sample also filled in the SDQ self-report and the Youth Self Report (YSR). The children from the clinic sample received an ICD-10 diagnosis if applicable. Scores from the parent and self-rated SDQ and CBCL/YSR were highly correlated and equally able to distinguish between the community and clinic samples, with the SDQ showing significantly better results regarding the total scores. They were also equally able to distinguish between disorders within the clinic sample, the only significant difference being that the SDQ was better able to differentiate between children with and without hyperactivity-inattention. The study shows that like the English originals, the SDQ-Deu and the German CBCL are equally valid for most clinical and research purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11202102     DOI: 10.1007/s007870070030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 1018-8827            Impact factor:   4.785


  92 in total

1.  [Therapy of functional abdominal pain in childhood. Concept, acceptance and preliminary results of a short hypnotherapeutic-behavioural intervention].

Authors:  M D Gulewitsch; J S Schauer; M Hautzinger; A A Schlarb
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Screening for the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder phenotype using the strength and difficulties questionnaire.

Authors:  Anne Karin Ullebø; Maj-Britt Posserud; Einar Heiervang; Christopher Gillberg; Carsten Obel
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  The Italian preadolescent mental health project (PrISMA): rationale and methods.

Authors:  Alessandra Frigerio; Laura Vanzin; Valentina Pastore; Maria Nobile; Roberto Giorda; Cecilia Marino; Massimo Molteni; Paola Rucci; Massimo Ammaniti; Loredana Lucarelli; Carlo Lenti; Mauro Walder; Andrea Martinuzzi; Ombretta Carlet; Filippo Muratori; Annarita Milone; Alessandro Zuddas; Pina Cavolina; Franco Nardocci; Andrea Tullini; Pierluigi Morosini; Gabriella Polidori; Giovanni De Girolamo
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  The Specificity of Psychological Factors Associated with Binge Eating in Adolescent Boys and Girls.

Authors:  Marie Sehm; Petra Warschburger
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2015-11

5.  Prevalence and correlates of probable adolescent mental health problems reported by parents in Vietnam.

Authors:  Ananda B Amstadter; Lisa Richardson; Alicia Meyer; Genelle Sawyer; Dean G Kilpatrick; Trinh Luong Tran; Lam Tu Trung; Nguyen Thanh Tam; Tran Tuan; La Thi Buoi; Tran Thu Ha; Tran Duc Thach; Mario Gaboury; Ron Acierno
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in pediatric traumatic brain injury research.

Authors:  Stephen R McCauley; Elisabeth A Wilde; Vicki A Anderson; Gary Bedell; Sue R Beers; Thomas F Campbell; Sandra B Chapman; Linda Ewing-Cobbs; Joan P Gerring; Gerard A Gioia; Harvey S Levin; Linda J Michaud; Mary R Prasad; Bonnie R Swaine; Lyn S Turkstra; Shari L Wade; Keith O Yeates
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children.

Authors:  Anna Goodman; Donna L Lamping; George B Ploubidis
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2010-11

8.  The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): the factor structure and scale validation in U.S. adolescents.

Authors:  Jian-Ping He; Marcy Burstein; Anja Schmitz; Kathleen R Merikangas
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-05

9.  Psychometric evaluation of the OM8-30 questionnaire in Dutch children with otitis media.

Authors:  Angelique A Timmerman; Cor M G Meesters; Lucien J C Anteunis; Michelene N Chenault; Mark P Haggard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  The factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Greek adolescents.

Authors:  George Giannakopoulos; Chara Tzavara; Christine Dimitrakaki; Gerasimos Kolaitis; Vasiliki Rotsika; Yannis Tountas
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.