Literature DB >> 11201470

Evaluation of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with FDG positron emission tomography.

P Li1, H Zhuang, P D Mozley, A Denittis, D Yeh, M Machtay, R Smith, A Alavi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the effectiveness of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or both for the assessment of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The value of quantifying the standardized uptake values (SUV) to distinguish recurrent neoplasm from inflammatory lesions and normal structures was also evaluated.
METHODS: Forty-three patients with head and neck cancer were examined with F-18 FDG PET at least 4 months after their last course of radiation therapy (mean, 11 months). The SUVs were measured in visually identified regions of abnormally increased activity and were compared with the values in normal mucosa, the base of the tongue, and the hard palate to determine if an optimal cutoff value exists for diagnosing recurrence of malignant lesions. The final diagnosis of recurrence was made based on biopsy or at least 6 months' clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: FDG PET correctly detected recurrence in 20 of 22 patients who had 45 discrete lesions located in the field of the upper aerodigestive tract. Two false-negative and three false-positive results were identified. The accuracy of FDG PET was 88% (38 of 43 patients), compared with 66% (25 of 38 patients) for CT, MRI, or both. Although there was a significant difference of SUVs (P = 0.0036) between the recurrent lesions and normal structures, the optimal cutoff values were difficult to define.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual analysis of FDG PET is significantly more accurate in the diagnosis of recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck than are CT or MRI. However, single SUV quantification does not significantly enhance efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11201470     DOI: 10.1097/00003072-200102000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after treatment.

Authors:  Suresh K Mukherji; Gregory T Wolf
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Postradiation metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  James D Murphy; Trang H La; Karen Chu; Andrew Quon; Nancy J Fischbein; Peter G Maxim; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Functional imaging in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  David I Kutler; Richard J Wong; Dennis H Kraus
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Assessment of clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET in patients with head and neck cancer: a probability analysis.

Authors:  Gerhard W Goerres; Katarzyna Mosna-Firlejczyk; Johann Steurer; Gustav K von Schulthess; Lucas M Bachmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Nuclear medicine imaging for the assessment of primary and recurrent head and neck carcinoma using routinely available tracers.

Authors:  Hubert Vermeersch; David Loose; Hamphrey Ham; Andreas Otte; Christophe Van de Wiele
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Clinical applications of tumor volume measurements for predicting outcome in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract.

Authors:  Suresh K Mukherji; Ilona M Schmalfuss; Jonas Castelijns; Anthony A Mancuso
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in pre and post treatment evaluation in head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Bundhit Tantiwongkosi; Fang Yu; Anand Kanard; Frank R Miller
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28

8.  Innovations in chemotherapy and radiation therapy: Implications and opportunities for the Asia-Pacific Rim.

Authors:  D E Heron; J E Shogan; J W Mucenski
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2008-07-01

Review 9.  What the clinician wants to know: surgical perspective and ultrasound for lymph node imaging of the neck.

Authors:  Michiel W M van den Brekel; Jonas A Castelijns
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Impact of FDG-PET/CT for the Detection of Unknown Primary Tumours in Patients with Cervical Lymph Node Metastases.

Authors:  Inanç Karapolat; Kamil Kumanlıoğlu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2012-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.