Literature DB >> 11200955

A factor model of the functional psychoses and the relationship of factors to clinical variables and brain morphology.

A M McIntosh1, A Forrester, S M Lawrie, M Byrne, A Harper, J N Kestelman, J J Best, E C Johnstone, D G Owens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite more than 100 years of study, there remains no definitive diagnostic validation of the functional psychoses. Factor analysis suggests the presence of three or more psychopathological syndromes in functional psychoses as a whole. The relationship between these factors and cerebral anatomy has been investigated in schizophrenia only. This study aimed to address the relationship of symptom factors to clinically important variables and cerebral anatomy in a sample of psychotic patients with a spread of diagnoses.
METHODS: In a sample of patients with functional psychoses, symptom data was obtained on four consecutive admissions using the OPCRIT symptom checklist. OPCRIT data was used to generate operational diagnoses in accordance with pre-set criteria and a principle components analysis was performed on symptom data. Factor loadings were compared between each admission to examine factor stability over time. Factor scores at first admission were also correlated with clinical variables obtained from patients' case notes. From the sample of 204 patients, 64 subjects were recruited and underwent an MRI scan of the brain. Regional anatomical volumes were compared with diagnosis and factor loadings at first admission.
RESULTS: A principal components analysis gave a four-factor solution of 'manic', 'depressive', 'disorganization' and 'reality distortion' factors at each admission. Factors showed a high degree of stability over the four admissions studied. The factors were significantly associated with several clinical variables. Three of the four factors were associated with a specific pattern of cerebral anatomy.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that factors may correspond to relatively specific disease processes underlying functional psychotic illness. We propose that the use of symptom factors may facilitate the investigation of the underlying mechanisms of psychotic illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11200955     DOI: 10.1017/s0033291799003177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  9 in total

Review 1.  Categorical vs dimensional classifications of psychotic disorders.

Authors:  Melissa Potuzak; Caitlin Ravichandran; Kathryn E Lewandowski; Dost Ongür; Bruce M Cohen
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.735

2.  Kraepelin was right: a latent class analysis of symptom dimensions in patients and controls.

Authors:  Eske M Derks; Judith Allardyce; Marco P Boks; Jeroen K Vermunt; Ron Hijman; Roel A Ophoff
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 3.  Dimensions and the psychosis phenotype.

Authors:  Judith Allardyce; Trisha Suppes; Jim Van Os
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Deconstructing Psychosis conference February 2006: the validity of schizophrenia and alternative approaches to the classification of psychosis.

Authors:  Judith Allardyce; Wolfgang Gaebel; Jurgen Zielasek; Jim van Os
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  A clinical comparison of schizophrenia with and without pre-onset cannabis use disorder: a retrospective cohort study using categorical and dimensional approaches.

Authors:  Samuel Sarrazin; Florence Louppe; Raphael Doukhan; Franck Schürhoff
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Association Between Schizophrenia-Related Polygenic Liability and the Occurrence and Level of Mood-Incongruent Psychotic Symptoms in Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Judith Allardyce; Ganna Leonenko; Marian Hamshere; Antonio F Pardiñas; Liz Forty; Sarah Knott; Katherine Gordon-Smith; David J Porteous; Caroline Haywood; Arianna Di Florio; Lisa Jones; Andrew M McIntosh; Michael J Owen; Peter Holmans; James T R Walters; Nicholas Craddock; Ian Jones; Michael C O'Donovan; Valentina Escott-Price
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 25.911

7.  Harnessing clinical psychiatric data with an electronic assessment tool (OPCRIT+): the utility of symptom dimensions.

Authors:  Philip James Brittain; Sarah Elizabeth Margaret Lobo; James Rucker; Myanthi Amarasinghe; Anantha Padmanabha Pillai Anilkumar; Martin Baggaley; Pallavi Banerjee; Jenny Bearn; Matthew Broadbent; Matthew Butler; Colin Donald Campbell; Anthony James Cleare; Luiz Dratcu; Sophia Frangou; Fiona Gaughran; Matthew Goldin; Annika Henke; Nikola Kern; Abdallah Krayem; Faiza Mufti; Ronan McIvor; Humphrey Needham-Bennett; Stuart Newman; Dele Olajide; David O'Flynn; Ranga Rao; Ijaz Ur Rehman; Gertrude Seneviratne; Daniel Stahl; Sajid Suleman; Janet Treasure; John Tully; David Veale; Robert Stewart; Peter McGuffin; Simon Lovestone; Matthew Hotopf; Gunter Schumann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Do symptom dimensions or categorical diagnoses best discriminate between known risk factors for psychosis?

Authors:  Judith Allardyce; Robin G McCreadie; Gary Morrison; Jim van Os
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 4.328

9.  Prognostic Value of Affective Symptoms in First-Admission Psychotic Patients.

Authors:  Marta Arrasate; Itxaso González-Ortega; Adriana García-Alocén; Susana Alberich; Iñaki Zorrilla; Ana González-Pinto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.