BACKGROUND: Despite more than 100 years of study, there remains no definitive diagnostic validation of the functional psychoses. Factor analysis suggests the presence of three or more psychopathological syndromes in functional psychoses as a whole. The relationship between these factors and cerebral anatomy has been investigated in schizophrenia only. This study aimed to address the relationship of symptom factors to clinically important variables and cerebral anatomy in a sample of psychotic patients with a spread of diagnoses. METHODS: In a sample of patients with functional psychoses, symptom data was obtained on four consecutive admissions using the OPCRIT symptom checklist. OPCRIT data was used to generate operational diagnoses in accordance with pre-set criteria and a principle components analysis was performed on symptom data. Factor loadings were compared between each admission to examine factor stability over time. Factor scores at first admission were also correlated with clinical variables obtained from patients' case notes. From the sample of 204 patients, 64 subjects were recruited and underwent an MRI scan of the brain. Regional anatomical volumes were compared with diagnosis and factor loadings at first admission. RESULTS: A principal components analysis gave a four-factor solution of 'manic', 'depressive', 'disorganization' and 'reality distortion' factors at each admission. Factors showed a high degree of stability over the four admissions studied. The factors were significantly associated with several clinical variables. Three of the four factors were associated with a specific pattern of cerebral anatomy. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that factors may correspond to relatively specific disease processes underlying functional psychotic illness. We propose that the use of symptom factors may facilitate the investigation of the underlying mechanisms of psychotic illness.
BACKGROUND: Despite more than 100 years of study, there remains no definitive diagnostic validation of the functional psychoses. Factor analysis suggests the presence of three or more psychopathological syndromes in functional psychoses as a whole. The relationship between these factors and cerebral anatomy has been investigated in schizophrenia only. This study aimed to address the relationship of symptom factors to clinically important variables and cerebral anatomy in a sample of psychoticpatients with a spread of diagnoses. METHODS: In a sample of patients with functional psychoses, symptom data was obtained on four consecutive admissions using the OPCRIT symptom checklist. OPCRIT data was used to generate operational diagnoses in accordance with pre-set criteria and a principle components analysis was performed on symptom data. Factor loadings were compared between each admission to examine factor stability over time. Factor scores at first admission were also correlated with clinical variables obtained from patients' case notes. From the sample of 204 patients, 64 subjects were recruited and underwent an MRI scan of the brain. Regional anatomical volumes were compared with diagnosis and factor loadings at first admission. RESULTS: A principal components analysis gave a four-factor solution of 'manic', 'depressive', 'disorganization' and 'reality distortion' factors at each admission. Factors showed a high degree of stability over the four admissions studied. The factors were significantly associated with several clinical variables. Three of the four factors were associated with a specific pattern of cerebral anatomy. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that factors may correspond to relatively specific disease processes underlying functional psychotic illness. We propose that the use of symptom factors may facilitate the investigation of the underlying mechanisms of psychotic illness.
Authors: Eske M Derks; Judith Allardyce; Marco P Boks; Jeroen K Vermunt; Ron Hijman; Roel A Ophoff Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Judith Allardyce; Ganna Leonenko; Marian Hamshere; Antonio F Pardiñas; Liz Forty; Sarah Knott; Katherine Gordon-Smith; David J Porteous; Caroline Haywood; Arianna Di Florio; Lisa Jones; Andrew M McIntosh; Michael J Owen; Peter Holmans; James T R Walters; Nicholas Craddock; Ian Jones; Michael C O'Donovan; Valentina Escott-Price Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 25.911
Authors: Philip James Brittain; Sarah Elizabeth Margaret Lobo; James Rucker; Myanthi Amarasinghe; Anantha Padmanabha Pillai Anilkumar; Martin Baggaley; Pallavi Banerjee; Jenny Bearn; Matthew Broadbent; Matthew Butler; Colin Donald Campbell; Anthony James Cleare; Luiz Dratcu; Sophia Frangou; Fiona Gaughran; Matthew Goldin; Annika Henke; Nikola Kern; Abdallah Krayem; Faiza Mufti; Ronan McIvor; Humphrey Needham-Bennett; Stuart Newman; Dele Olajide; David O'Flynn; Ranga Rao; Ijaz Ur Rehman; Gertrude Seneviratne; Daniel Stahl; Sajid Suleman; Janet Treasure; John Tully; David Veale; Robert Stewart; Peter McGuffin; Simon Lovestone; Matthew Hotopf; Gunter Schumann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Judith Allardyce; Robin G McCreadie; Gary Morrison; Jim van Os Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2007-05-14 Impact factor: 4.328