Literature DB >> 11200196

List equivalency and test-retest reliability of the Speech in Noise test.

R A Bentler1.   

Abstract

The Speech in Noise (SIN) test consists of a series of Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers sentences presented in a background of four-talker babble at two presentation levels (83 and 53 dB SPL) and four signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) (15, 10, 5, and 0 dB). In this study, the nine lists were tested for equivalency and the test-retest reliability was determined. Twenty listeners with normal hearing and 20 listeners with sloping sensorineural hearing losses served as subjects. Five sentences were presented at each SNR at each level, and five key words in each sentence were scored (100 key words per presentation level). Each key word was scored as correct or incorrect, with errors of plurality scored as half-correct words. For percent-correct scores, Lists 1, 2, and 9 and Lists 3, 4, and 5 were found to be equivalent for listeners with normal hearing. For both groups of listeners, the test-retest correlations were high, and the critical differences appropriate for sentence material were 10 to 16% at a .95 level of confidence. Because of floor and ceiling effects across the different lists, many subjects with normal hearing did not score as low as the 50% level, and many subjects with hearing loss did not score as high as 50%. Suggestions are offered for alternate scoring in order to obtain a SNR for 50% performance. Future versions of this test should be designed with improved list equivalency and 50% performance capability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11200196     DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2000/010)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of possible factors of vocal interference during the teaching activity.

Authors:  Bárbara Gabriela Silva; Tiago Visacre Chammas; Marcia Simões Zenari; Renata Rodrigues Moreira; Alessandra Giannella Samelli; Kátia Nemr
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.106

2.  List Equivalency of PRESTO for the Evaluation of Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Kathleen F Faulkner; Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Masked sentence recognition assessed at ascending target-to-masker ratios: modest effects of repeating stimuli.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lauren Calandruccio; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Neurofeedback Training of Auditory Selective Attention Enhances Speech-In-Noise Perception.

Authors:  Subong Kim; Caroline Emory; Inyong Choi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Predictive models for cochlear implant outcomes: Performance, generalizability, and the impact of cohort size.

Authors:  Elaheh Shafieibavani; Benjamin Goudey; Isabell Kiral; Peter Zhong; Antonio Jimeno-Yepes; Annalisa Swan; Manoj Gambhir; Andreas Buechner; Eugen Kludt; Robert H Eikelboom; Cathy Sucher; Rene H Gifford; Riaan Rottier; Kerrie Plant; Hamideh Anjomshoa
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.