Literature DB >> 11200193

Central auditory processes and test measures: ASHA 1996 revisited.

R L Schow1, J A Seikel, G D Chermak, M Berent.   

Abstract

The theoretical issues surrounding central auditory processing disorders (CAPD) are reviewed here, especially with reference to the central auditory behavioral processes and the auditory test measures as prescribed in the ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54) statement on CAPD. A simplified nomenclature is recommended that directly relates process and test measure to facilitate the diagnostic process in CAPD. This new terminology closely follows the ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54) document, but provides some refinement based on recent research in CAPD. To support this recommendation, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied to the findings of Domitz and Schow (2000, American Journal of Audiology), who proposed use of a battery of CAPD tests, the Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment (MAPA) for testing school children. The CFA was found to reinforce the four-factor model, which clearly emerged in the exploratory factor analysis of Domitz and Schow. The model was found to be reasonably consistent even when subtests from the SCAN were included in the analysis. Refinement and revision of ASHA (1996, American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41-54) is recommended to facilitate diagnosis, subclassification, and intervention for CAPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11200193     DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2000/013)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  7 in total

1.  [Auditory processing and perception disorders--diagnostics. Guidelines of the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology].

Authors:  M Gross; R Berger; R Schönweiler; A Nickisch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Auditory processing disorders : Consensus statement by the German Society for Phoniatry and Paedaudiology].

Authors:  A Nickisch; M Gross; R Schönweiler; V Uttenweiler; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen; R Berger; H J Radü; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  A twin study of auditory processing indicates that dichotic listening ability is a strongly heritable trait.

Authors:  Robert J Morell; Carmen C Brewer; Dongliang Ge; Harold Snieder; Christopher K Zalewski; Kelly A King; Dennis Drayna; Thomas B Friedman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  [The binaural interaction component: a clinically useful diagnostic instrument?].

Authors:  W Delb
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  [Auditory processing and perception disorders (APPD): summary and updated overview].

Authors:  A Nickisch; M Gross; R Schönweiler; R Berger; T Wiesner; A Am Zehnhoff Dinnesen; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  [Auditory processing disorder (APD): first normative data for the standardised diagnosis in school-age children].

Authors:  B Wohlleben; J Rosenfeld; M Gross
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Reference values for psychoacoustic tests on Polish school children 7-10 years old.

Authors:  Elżbieta A Włodarczyk; Agata Szkiełkowska; Henryk Skarżyński; Beata Miaśkiewicz; Piotr H Skarżyński
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.