Literature DB >> 11200191

Outcome of newborn hearing screening by ABR compared with four different DPOAE pass criteria.

S E Barker1, M M Lesperance, P R Kileny.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) testing as screening methodologies suitable for universal application at a large birthing hospital. Five hundred sixty-nine neonates (1184 ears) without risk indicators for hearing loss underwent DPOAE and ABR screening before hospital discharge at birth. All ears (100%) passed the ABR screening. DPOAE results were categorized on the basis of the number of frequencies at which emissions were obtained as well as presence versus absence of a replicated response at each test frequency. Pass and refer rates varied widely, on the basis of whether the presence of DPOAE response at 2000 Hz or replication were required. With the most stringent criteria, only 64.44% of ears passed, whereas with the least stringent criteria 88.94% passed. Given that 100% of ears passed according to the gold standard of the ABR screening, these results indicate false-positive rates ranging from 11% to 35% by DPOAE screening. This discrepancy in pass and refer rates when various criteria are applied indicates the need for standardization and further comparison of appropriate pass criteria for newborn hearing screening programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11200191     DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2000/017)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  4 in total

1.  Status of Newborn Hearing Screening Program in the State of Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Madhan Chandrasekar; Heramba Ganapathy Selvarajan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-26

Review 2.  Hearing screening and diagnostic evaluation of children with unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Danielle S Ross; W June Holstrum; Marcus Gaffney; Denise Green; Robert F Oyler; Judith S Gravel
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-03

3.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Pure-Tone and Subjective Hearing Screenings Using Spanish-Language Questions.

Authors:  Alyssa Everett; Aileen Wong; Rosie Piper; Barbara Cone; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.493

4.  Outcomes of newborn hearing screening at an academic secondary level hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Bezuidenhout; Katijah Khoza-Shangase; Tim De Maayer; Renate Strehlau
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2021-01-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.