Literature DB >> 11198726

Moxifloxacin versus cephalexin in the treatment of uncomplicated skin infections.

L C Parish1, H B Routh, B Miskin, J Fidelholtz, P Werschler, A Heyd, D Haverstock, D Church.   

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of oral moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily, 7 days) versus cephalexin (500 mg three times daily, 7 days) were compared in a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial in 401 adults with uncomplicated skin infections. Clinical outcome was evaluated in 351 patients. Moxifloxacin proved to be as effective as cephalexin both clinically (90% versus 91%, respectively) and bacteriologically in eradicating the most frequently isolated pathogen Staphylococcus aureus (92% and 93%, respectively). Moxifloxacin was more effective than cephalexin in eliminating Streptococcus spp. (90% and 82%, respectively). Drug-related adverse events were comparable in both treatment groups with the most frequently reported being nausea in the moxifloxacin-treated patients and headache in the cephalexin-treated patients. Medication was discontinued due to unwanted reactions in 3% of the moxifloxacin- and 4% of the cephalexin-treated patients. Moxifloxacin, 400 mg once daily for 7 days, is as safe and effective as cephalexin 500 mg three times daily for 7 days in the treatment of uncomplicated skin infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11198726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

1.  Infected cat-bite wound treated successfully with moxifloxacin after failure of parenteral cefuroxime and ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  R Draenert; M Kunzelmann; A Roggenkamp; J Hellers; J R Bogner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Drug use evaluation of moxifloxacin (avelox) using a hand-held electronic device at a canadian teaching hospital.

Authors:  Jennifer A E Samilski; Tim T Y Lau; Dean H T Elbe; Amneet K Aulakh; Eric M C Lun
Journal:  P T       Date:  2012-05

3.  Efficacy of topically delivered moxifloxacin against wound infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  F Jacobsen; C Fisahn; M Sorkin; I Thiele; T Hirsch; I Stricker; T Klaassen; A Roemer; B Fugmann; L Steinstraesser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Moxifloxacin in uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  Richard B R Muijsers; Blair Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Interventions for impetigo.

Authors:  Sander Koning; Renske van der Sande; Arianne P Verhagen; Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit; Andrew D Morris; Christopher C Butler; Marjolein Berger; Johannes C van der Wouden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

Review 6.  A practical guide to the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Horatio B Fung; Joanne Y Chang; Stephen Kuczynski
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Newer treatment options for skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Murugan Raghavan; Peter K Linden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  The Role of Fluoroquinolones in the Treatment of Skin and Soft Tissue Infection.

Authors:  Md Rabiul Alam; Ellie Hershberger; Marcus J. Zervos
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 9.  Moxifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Gender analysis of moxifloxacin clinical trials.

Authors:  Elisa Chilet-Rosell; Ma Teresa Ruiz-Cantero; Ma Angeles Pardo
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.