Literature DB >> 11198125

Behavioural pharmacology and its contribution to the molecular basis of memory consolidation.

I Izquierdo1, J L McGaugh.   

Abstract

Recent findings have significantly advanced our understanding the mechanisms of memory formation. Most of these advances stemmed from behavioural pharmacology research involving, particularly, the localized infusion of drugs with specific molecular actions into specific brain regions. This approach has revealed brain structures involved in different memory types and the main neurotransmitter systems and sequence of metabolic cascades that participate in memory consolidation. Biochemical studies and, in several cases, studies of genetically manipulated animals, in which receptors or enzymes affected by the various drugs were absent or overexpressed, have complemented the pharmacological research. Although most studies have concentrated on the involvement of the hippocampus, many have also investigated the entorhinal cortex, other regions of the cortex, and the amygdala. Behavioural pharmacology has been of crucial importance in establishing the major neurohumoral and hormonal systems involved in the modulation of memory formation. These systems act on specific steps of memory formation in the hippocampus and in the entorhinal, parietal, and cingulate cortex. A specialized system mediated by the basolateral amygdaloid nucleus, and involving several neuromodulatory systems, is activated by emotional arousal and serves to regulate memory formation in other brain regions. The core mechanisms involved in the formation of explicit (declarative) memory are in many respects similar to those of long-term potentiation (LTP), particularly in the hippocampus. However, there are also important differences between memory formation and LTP. Memory formation involves numerous modulatory influences, the co-participation of various brain regions other than the hippocampus, and some properties that are specific to memory and absent in LTP (i.e. flexibility of response). We discuss the implications of these similarities and differences for understanding the neural bases of memory.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11198125     DOI: 10.1097/00008877-200011000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  34 in total

Review 1.  Molecular pharmacological dissection of short- and long-term memory.

Authors:  Luciana A Izquierdo; Daniela M Barros; Monica R M Vianna; Adriana Coitinho; Tiago deDavid e Silva; Humberto Choi; Beatriz Moletta; Jorge H Medina; Ivan Izquierdo
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.046

2.  Inhibition of mRNA and protein synthesis in the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus blocks reinstallment of an extinguished conditioned fear response.

Authors:  Martín Cammarota; Lia R M Bevilaqua; Daniel Kerr; Jorge H Medina; Iván Izquierdo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Enhancement of inhibitory avoidance and conditioned taste aversion memory with insular cortex infusions of 8-Br-cAMP: involvement of the basolateral amygdala.

Authors:  María I Miranda; James L McGaugh
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  The effect of sevoflurane on the expression of M1 acetylcholine receptor in the hippocampus and cognitive function of aged rats.

Authors:  Sheng Peng; Yan Zhang; Guo-Jun Li; Deng-Xin Zhang; Da-Peng Sun; Qiang Fang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Organosulfur compound protects against memory decline induced by scopolamine through modulation of oxidative stress and Na+/K+ ATPase activity in mice.

Authors:  Fernanda D da Silva; Mikaela P Pinz; Renata L de Oliveira; Karline C Rodrigues; Francine R Ianiski; Mariana M Bassaco; Claudio C Silveira; Cristiano R Jesse; Silvane S Roman; Ethel A Wilhelm; Cristiane Luchese
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 6.  Drug enhancement of memory consolidation: historical perspective and neurobiological implications.

Authors:  James L McGaugh; Benno Roozendaal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Strain Differences in Presynaptic Function: PROTEOMICS, ULTRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOLOGY OF HIPPOCAMPAL SYNAPSES IN DBA/2J AND C57Bl/6J MICE.

Authors:  A Mariette Lenselink; Diana C Rotaru; Ka Wan Li; Pim van Nierop; Priyanka Rao-Ruiz; Maarten Loos; Roel van der Schors; Yvonne Gouwenberg; Joke Wortel; Huibert D Mansvelder; August B Smit; Sabine Spijker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Acquisition and long-term retention of spatial learning in the human immunodeficiency virus-1 transgenic rat: effects of repeated nicotine treatment.

Authors:  Michael Vigorito; Junran Cao; Ming D Li; Sulie L Chang
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 2.643

9.  The inhibition of acquired fear.

Authors:  Iván Izquierdo; Martín Cammarota; Mónica M R Vianna; Lía R M Bevilaqua
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.911

Review 10.  A pharmacological analysis of an associative learning task: 5-HT(1) to 5-HT(7) receptor subtypes function on a pavlovian/instrumental autoshaped memory.

Authors:  Alfredo Meneses
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.