Literature DB >> 11196221

The biomedical disciplines and the structure of biomedical and clinical knowledge.

H Nederbragt1.   

Abstract

The relation between biomedical knowledge and clinical knowledge is discussed by comparing their respective structures. The knowledge of a disease as a biological phenomenon is constructed by the interaction of facts and theories from the main biomedical disciplines: epidemiology, diagnostics, clinical trial, therapy development and pathogenesis. Although these facts and theories are based on probabilities and extrapolations, the interaction provides a reliable and coherent structure, comparable to a Kuhnian paradigma. In the structure of clinical knowledge, i.e. knowledge of the patient with the disease, not only biomedical knowledge contributes to the structure but also economic and social relations, ethics and personal experience. However, the interaction between each of the participating "knowledges" in clinical knowledge is not based on mutual dependency and accumulation of different arguments from each, as in biomedical knowledge, but on competition and partial exclusion. Therefore, the structure of biomedical knowledge is different from that of clinical knowledge. This difference is used as the basis for a discussion in which the place of technology, evidence-based medicine and the gap between scientific and clinical knowledge are evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11196221     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026510723597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  12 in total

1.  The two cultures of medicine: objective facts versus subjectivity and values.

Authors:  H Wulff
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Steps towards a theory of medical practice.

Authors:  P Hucklenbroich
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-06

3.  The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  M R Tonelli
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Narrative based medicine: narrative based medicine in an evidence based world.

Authors:  T Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-30

Review 5.  Assigning causation in disease: beyond Koch's postulates.

Authors:  M C Sutter
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.416

Review 6.  Principles and philosophy of modeling in biomedical research.

Authors:  T F Massoud; G J Hademenos; W L Young; E Gao; J Pile-Spellman; F Viñuela
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Health science, natural science, and clinical knowledge.

Authors:  R J Bench
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1989-04

8.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

9.  Oestrogen receptor and its potential role in breast cancer development.

Authors:  R A Walker
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.996

10.  Philosophy of medical practice: a discursive approach.

Authors:  E Van Leeuwen; G K Kimsma
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1997 Mar-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.