Literature DB >> 11195308

Subitizing and its subprocesses.

K F Wender1, R Rothkegel.   

Abstract

When people are presented with small sets of elements such as dots they can very easily determine their number. This ability has been called subitizing. The present paper reports results from four experiments. The discussion focuses on the question whether one or two psychological processes have to be assumed for this task of subitizing. Taken together our results support the two-process theories. In particular, a distinction between a process of separation and a process of enumeration is suggested. Experiments 3 and 4 support the canonical pattern hypothesis. Canonical patterns are processed substantially faster than noncanonical patterns. Furthermore, if a complex pattern can be broken down into small canonical patterns, then participants follow a partition and add strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11195308     DOI: 10.1007/s004260000021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  13 in total

1.  Small Subitizing Range in People with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Kirsten O'Hearn; James E Hoffman; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-03

2.  Subitizing and similarity: toward a pattern-matching theory of enumeration.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; N Jane Zbrodoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

3.  The complexity of simple counting: ERP findings reveal early perceptual and late numerical processes in different arrangements.

Authors:  Shadi Akbari; Mojtaba Soltanlou; Hassan Sabourimoghaddam; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Hartmut Leuthold
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Mastery of structured quantities like finger or dice patterns predict arithmetic performance.

Authors:  Isabella Luise Kreilinger; Stephanie Roesch; Korbinian Moeller; Silvia Pixner
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2020-10-06

5.  Pitch enumeration: failure to subitize in audition.

Authors:  Neil M McLachlan; David J T Marco; Sarah J Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spatial Arrangement and Set Size Influence the Coding of Non-symbolic Quantities in the Intraparietal Sulcus.

Authors:  Johannes Bloechle; Julia F Huber; Elise Klein; Julia Bahnmueller; Johannes Rennig; Korbinian Moeller; Stefan Huber
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity.

Authors:  Paula A Maldonado Moscoso; Mark W Greenlee; Giovanni Anobile; Roberto Arrighi; David C Burr; Elisa Castaldi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Unimpaired groupitizing in children and adolescents with dyscalculia.

Authors:  Giovanni Anobile; Moreno Marazzi; Stefano Federici; Agnese Napoletti; Lucia Cecconi; Roberto Arrighi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Modulating attentional load affects numerosity estimation: evidence against a pre-attentive subitizing mechanism.

Authors:  Petra Vetter; Brian Butterworth; Bahador Bahrami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Grouping strategies in number estimation extend the subitizing range.

Authors:  Paula A Maldonado Moscoso; Elisa Castaldi; David C Burr; Roberto Arrighi; Giovanni Anobile
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.