AIM: We evaluated the effect of different stimulation protocols on atrial flutter interruption by transoesophageal pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS:Eighty patients with new onset atrial flutter were randomized into four groups. Pacing was attempted under the following conditions: with short bursts (5 s), without treatment (group A) and after oral administration of propafenone 600 mg (group B); with prolonged bursts (30 s), without treatment (group C) and after oral administration of propafenone 600 mg (group D). Pacing interrupted atrial flutter in 20% of patients in A, 55% in B, 50% in C and 85% in D. The use of longer bursts gave better results both in patients without treatment (P < 0.05: C vs A) and in patients with propafenone (P < 0.05: D vs B). Comparing groups with the same stimulation protocol, we observed a better response in patients treated with propafenone (P < 0.05: B vs A and D vs C). In the groups without treatment the use of shorter bursts was associated with a lower induction of stable atrial fibrillation (three vs nine episodes), in the groups on propafenone no differences were observed (one vs one episode). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the association of propafenone with long bursts gives the best result for interruption of new onset atrial flutter by transoesophageal pacing.
RCT Entities:
AIM: We evaluated the effect of different stimulation protocols on atrial flutter interruption by transoesophageal pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty patients with new onset atrial flutter were randomized into four groups. Pacing was attempted under the following conditions: with short bursts (5 s), without treatment (group A) and after oral administration of propafenone 600 mg (group B); with prolonged bursts (30 s), without treatment (group C) and after oral administration of propafenone 600 mg (group D). Pacing interrupted atrial flutter in 20% of patients in A, 55% in B, 50% in C and 85% in D. The use of longer bursts gave better results both in patients without treatment (P < 0.05: C vs A) and in patients with propafenone (P < 0.05: D vs B). Comparing groups with the same stimulation protocol, we observed a better response in patients treated with propafenone (P < 0.05: B vs A and D vs C). In the groups without treatment the use of shorter bursts was associated with a lower induction of stable atrial fibrillation (three vs nine episodes), in the groups on propafenone no differences were observed (one vs one episode). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the association of propafenone with long bursts gives the best result for interruption of new onset atrial flutter by transoesophageal pacing.
Authors: Dario Besusso; Louise Saul; Melanie D Leech; Richard A O'Connor; Andrew S MacDonald; Stephen M Anderton; Richard J Mellanby Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 7.561