Literature DB >> 11194420

Antenatal transfer of rural women to perinatal centres. High Risk Obstetric and Perinatal Advisory Working Group.

C L Roberts1, D Henderson-Smart, D A Ellwood.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe antenatal transfers of rural women to perinatal centres, and among transferred women, to assess the use of selected evidence-based therapies and determine the predictors of preterm and imminent births. The clinical records of rural women antenatally transferred to perinatal centres in NSW and the ACT during 1997-1998 were reviewed. Of 453 rural antenatal transfers, 408 (90%) were emergency transfers. Increasing remoteness was associated with increased rates of antenatal transfer but not with a lower probability of giving birth. Of all transferred women, 64% delivered; 58% of preterm transfers delivered preterm and of those delivering preterm, 76% delivered within 7 days. Although the main reason for antenatal transfer was the possibility of preterm birth, women presenting with preterm contractions only were less likely to deliver preterm (OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.4) or < or = 7 days (OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5) than women with any other presenting symptoms. The overall usage of effective interventions (antenatal steroids, antibiotics for PPROM and beta-mimetic tocolysis to delay birth) among antenatally transferred rural women was high, but there is room for increased uptake prior to transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11194420     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb01165.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  3 in total

1.  Guidelines and management of mild hypertensive conditions in pregnancy in rural general practices in Scotland: issues of appropriateness and access.

Authors:  J Tucker; J Farmer; P Stimpson
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-08

2.  Time-to-delivery after maternal transfer to a tertiary perinatal centre.

Authors:  Fiona H Hutchinson; Mark W Davies
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Bahareh Goodarzi; Annika Walker; Lianne Holten; Linda Schoonmade; Pim Teunissen; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.