A M Horowitz1, P Siriphant, A Sheikh, W L Child. 1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Building 45, Room 3AN-44B, 45 Center Drive MSC 6401, Bethesda, Md. 20892-6401, USA. Alice.Horowitz@nih.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maryland's mortality rate for oral and pharyngeal cancer is seventh highest overall in the United States, sixth highest for men and third highest for African-American men. As part of a statewide needs assessment and in follow-up to a mail survey of Maryland general dentists, focus groups were conducted to obtain more in-depth information about why dentists do not provide a comprehensive oral cancer examination for most of their patients and how to solve this problem from a dentist's perspective. METHODS: A trained focus group moderator conducted two focus groups of general practice dentists in two locations in Maryland. Five major themes emerged from the two focus groups: inaccurate knowledge about oral cancer; inconsistency in oral cancer examinations; lack of confidence in when and how to palpate for abnormalities; lack of time to routinely provide oral cancer examinations; and recommendations to help resolve these issues. CONCLUSIONS: The focus groups provided a rich source of ideas on how to best provide dentists with continuing education about oral cancer prevention and early detection. Participants also provided opinions about the need to improve the public's awareness of oral cancer and its prevention. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists need to include comprehensive oral cancer examinations as part of their routine oral examinations for all appropriate patients.
BACKGROUND: Maryland's mortality rate for oral and pharyngeal cancer is seventh highest overall in the United States, sixth highest for men and third highest for African-American men. As part of a statewide needs assessment and in follow-up to a mail survey of Maryland general dentists, focus groups were conducted to obtain more in-depth information about why dentists do not provide a comprehensive oral cancer examination for most of their patients and how to solve this problem from a dentist's perspective. METHODS: A trained focus group moderator conducted two focus groups of general practice dentists in two locations in Maryland. Five major themes emerged from the two focus groups: inaccurate knowledge about oral cancer; inconsistency in oral cancer examinations; lack of confidence in when and how to palpate for abnormalities; lack of time to routinely provide oral cancer examinations; and recommendations to help resolve these issues. CONCLUSIONS: The focus groups provided a rich source of ideas on how to best provide dentists with continuing education about oral cancer prevention and early detection. Participants also provided opinions about the need to improve the public's awareness of oral cancer and its prevention. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists need to include comprehensive oral cancer examinations as part of their routine oral examinations for all appropriate patients.
Authors: Douglas E Morse; Carmen M Vélez Vega; Walter J Psoter; Himilce Vélez; Carmen J Buxó; Linda S Baek; Augusto Elias; Melba Sánchez Ayendez Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Holdunn Rutkoski; Brynn Fowler; Ryan Mooney; Lisa Pappas; Barbara L Dixon; Lilliam M Pinzon; James Winkler; Deanna Kepka Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Shiela M Strauss; Janet Tuthill; Geetika Singh; David Rindskopf; Jack A Maggiore; Robert Schoor; Anya Brodsky; Adi Einhorn; Amanda Hochstein; Stefanie Russell; Mary Rosedale Journal: J Periodontol Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 6.993
Authors: Walter J Psoter; Douglas E Morse; Melba Sánchez-Ayendez; Carmen M Vélez Vega; Maria L Aguilar; Carmen J Buxó-Martinez; Jodi A Psoter; Alexander R Kerr; Christina M Lane; Vincent J Scaringi; Augusto Elias Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Clarice Magalhães Rodrigues dos Reis; Antônio Thomaz Gonzaga da Matta-Machado; João Henrique Lara do Amaral; Marcos Azeredo Furquim Werneck; Mauro Henrique Nogueira Guimarães de Abreu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 3.390