Literature DB >> 11194369

Effects of irrigation on debris and smear layer on canal walls prepared by two rotary techniques: a scanning electron microscopic study.

O A Peters1, F Barbakow.   

Abstract

Debris and smear layer were evaluated in canals prepared with either Lightspeed (LS) or ProFile (PF) rotary instruments. Irrigants used were tap water (group A) or alternating 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA (group B). Apical stops were prepared to size 52.5 in the LS and to size 6 (approximately ISO size 36) in the PF techniques. The roots were split longitudinally and examined at apical, middle and coronal levels for debris and the smear layer using a 5-step scale. Using only water, mean debris scores were similar for LS and PF. In contrast, with EDTA/NaOCl, LS- and PF-prepared canals had similar debris scores at the apical and coronal levels, but there was a significant difference at the middle level. Mean smear layer scores were similar in LS- and PF-shaped canals when water was the sole irrigant. In contrast, with NaOCl and EDTA, mean smear layer scores were significantly different at the apical and middle levels, but not at the coronal level. Neither technique was superior in removing debris, but larger canal preparations obtained in this study with LS instruments enabled a more effective removal of the smear layer in the EDTA-NaOCl group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11194369     DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200001000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  21 in total

1.  Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Root Canal Surfaces Prepared with LightSpeed & Endowave Rotary System.

Authors:  Hema B S; G S Chandu; Vijayakumar L Shiraguppi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

2.  Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study.

Authors:  Amr M Elnaghy; Ayman Mandorah; Shaymaa E Elsaka
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal using different irrigant activation methods (EndoActivator, EndoVac, PUI and LAI). An in vitro study.

Authors:  Manuele Mancini; Loredana Cerroni; Lorenzo Iorio; Lorenzo Dall'Asta; Luigi Cianconi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Resistance to vertical root fracture of apicoected teeth using different devices during two root canal irrigation procedures.

Authors:  Ferhat Ayrancı; Leyla Benan Ayrancı; Alper Özdoğan; Serkan Özkan; Mutlunur Önder Peker; Mutan Hamdi Aras
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Assessment of genotoxic effect of maleic acid and EDTA: a comparative in vitro experimental study.

Authors:  Nidambur Vasudev Ballal; Bhuvanagiri Nageshwar Rao; Kundabala Mala; Kadengodlu Seetharama Bhat; Bola Sadashiva Satish Rao
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Efficacy of solution form of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on removing smear layer of root canal at different exposure time In Vitro.

Authors:  Sitashi Poudyal; Wei-Hong Pan; Liu Zhan
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-18

7.  The effect of the irrigant QMix on removal of canal wall smear layer: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Colin Eliot; John F Hatton; Gregory P Stewart; Charles F Hildebolt; M Jane Gillespie; James L Gutmann
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  Effect of Duration of Irrigation with Sodium Hypochlorite in Clinical Protocol of MTAD on Removal of Smear Layer and Creating Dentinal Erosion.

Authors:  Mehrdad Lotfi; Negar Moghaddam; Sepideh Vosoughhosseini; Vahid Zand; Mohammad Ali Saghiri
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2012-09-01

9.  Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Residual Smear Layer Following Preparation of Curved Root Canals Using Hand Instrumentation or Two Engine-Driven Systems.

Authors:  Abbasali Khademi; Masoud Saatchi; Mohammad Mehdi Shokouhi; Badri Baghaei
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2015

10.  A Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of intracanal smear layer removal by two different final irrigation activation systems.

Authors:  Deepti Dua; Ankur Dua; Veerendra M Uppin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.