Literature DB >> 11194050

Surface finishes on stainless steel reduce bacterial attachment and early biofilm formation: scanning electron and atomic force microscopy study.

J W Arnold1, G W Bailey.   

Abstract

Three common finishing treatments of stainless steel that are used for equipment during poultry processing were tested for resistance to bacterial contamination. Methods were developed to measure attached bacteria and to identify factors that make surface finishes susceptible or resistant to bacterial attachment and biofilm formation. Samples of the treated surfaces (sand-blasted, sanded, and electropolished) were exposed to natural bacterial populations from chicken carcass rinses to allow growth of bacteria and development of biofilms on the surfaces. The kinetics of bacterial growth during surface exposure was followed by UV-visible spectrophotometry, and counts of bacteria and early biofilm formation were measured following scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The surface morphology of the samples was analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) with samples from each of the batches of treatments used in the SEM studies. Relative differences in the surface morphology, including fractal dimensions, Z ranges, roughness, and other measurements corresponded by treatment with the differences in reduction of bacterial counts shown by SEM. The surface types varied in affinity for bacteria, and both physical and electrochemical treatments improved resistance of stainless steel to bacterial attachment. Electropolished stainless steel was the least rough surface and showed significantly fewer bacterial cells and beginning biofilm formations than the other treated surfaces. Food safety could be improved if bacterial populations could be reduced during processing by increasing the use of materials that are resistant to bacterial contamination. These findings will aid equipment manufacturers and processors in selecting materials and finishes that are most resistant to bacteria and biofilm formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11194050     DOI: 10.1093/ps/79.12.1839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  24 in total

1.  Use of a stainless steel washer platform to study Acinetobacter baumannii adhesion and biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces.

Authors:  Samantha J Orsinger-Jacobsen; Shenan S Patel; Ernestine M Vellozzi; Phillip Gialanella; Leonardo Nimrichter; Kildare Miranda; Luis R Martinez
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 2.  Bacterial cell attachment, the beginning of a biofilm.

Authors:  Jon Palmer; Steve Flint; John Brooks
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Methods for Biofilm Growth: A Mini-review.

Authors:  Christina Wilson; Rachel Lukowicz; Stefan Merchant; Helena Valquier-Flynn; Jeniffer Caballero; Jasmin Sandoval; Macduff Okuom; Christopher Huber; Tessa Durham Brooks; Erin Wilson; Barbara Clement; Christopher D Wentworth; Andrea E Holmes
Journal:  Res Rev J Eng Technol       Date:  2017-10-24

Review 4.  Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics.

Authors:  David Lebeaux; Jean-Marc Ghigo; Christophe Beloin
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 5.  Mechano-bactericidal actions of nanostructured surfaces.

Authors:  Denver P Linklater; Vladimir A Baulin; Saulius Juodkazis; Russell J Crawford; Paul Stoodley; Elena P Ivanova
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Microbe repelling coated stainless steel analysed by field emission scanning electron microscopy and physicochemical methods.

Authors:  Mari Raulio; Mikael Järn; Juhana Ahola; Jouko Peltonen; Jarl B Rosenholm; Sanna Tervakangas; Jukka Kolehmainen; Timo Ruokolainen; Pekka Narko; Mirja Salkinoja-Salonen
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Monitoring of growth and physiological activities of biofilm during succession on polystyrene from activated sludge under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  Iffat Naz; Syeda Ain-ul Batool; Naeem Ali; Nazia Khatoon; Niama Atiq; Abdul Hameed; Safia Ahmed
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Colorimetric assay for biofilms in wet processing conditions.

Authors:  Judy W Arnold
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  The transcriptional programme of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium reveals a key role for tryptophan metabolism in biofilms.

Authors:  Shea Hamilton; Roy J M Bongaerts; Francis Mulholland; Brett Cochrane; Jonathan Porter; Sacha Lucchini; Hilary M Lappin-Scott; Jay C D Hinton
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Sonication is superior to scraping for retrieval of bacteria in biofilm on titanium and steel surfaces in vitro.

Authors:  Geir Bjerkan; Eivind Witsø; Kåre Bergh
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.